Jan Siemerink
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | 5 | 4 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 5 | 4 | 9 | Feb 25, 1999 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 6 | 3 | 9 | Oct 4, 1998 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Magnus Larsson | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 3, 2001 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Justin Gimelstob holds a 2–1 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Justin Gimelstob leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 2000 Tashkent round of 32 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Gimelstob | 6-4 6-3 | Jan Siemerink | Match data | Sep 14, 2000* | R32 | Tashkent | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jan Siemerink | 4-6 6-2 7-5 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data | May 4, 2000* | R32 | Orlando | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
| Justin Gimelstob | 3-6 7-6(7) 6-0 | Jan Siemerink | Match data | Sep 26, 1997* | R16 | Toulouse | World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,902 | 261 | 262 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,722 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #57 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–28 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,861 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,573 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,531 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1997 | 15 | 16 | 31 | 48.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 21 | 1991 | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 1998 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1992 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 1999 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1993 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 2000 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2001 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 2002 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1996 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 2003 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2004 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 2005 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2006 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 2001 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 129 | 121 | 250 | 51.6% | 29 | 50 | 79 | 36.7% | 28 | 30 | 58 | 48.3% | 75 | 61 | 136 | 55.1% | — | 71 | 112 | 183 | 38.8% | 8 | 17 | 25 | 32.0% | 24 | 35 | 59 | 40.7% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/514 of Jan Siemerink's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 62.7% | 69.5% | 44.6% | 68.1% | 31.7% | 59.4% | 30.5% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 10/12 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 54.9% | 73.3% | 46.5% | 41.8% | 50.8% | 61.4% | 35.3% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 36/40 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 58.7% | 71.8% | 44.8% | 51.3% | 37.8% | 60.5% | 35.9% |
| 21 | 1991 | 48/51 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 52.3% | 75.3% | 53.3% | 58.8% | 44.6% | 64.8% | 37.8% | 1998 | 26/29 | 5.5 | 3.9 | 59.7% | 72.6% | 47.9% | 55.6% | 44.3% | 62.5% | 39.5% |
| 22 | 1992 | 42/49 | 6.2 | 4.2 | 54.6% | 72.8% | 50.4% | 63.1% | 36.0% | 62.7% | 34.7% | 1999 | 37/43 | 6.9 | 3.9 | 60.4% | 72.2% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 39.5% | 62.4% | 35.7% |
| 23 | 1993 | 41/49 | 6.4 | 4.0 | 56.6% | 76.6% | 50.8% | 62.6% | 44.2% | 65.2% | 35.5% | 2000 | 29/30 | 8.3 | 4.4 | 58.7% | 73.7% | 49.6% | 57.8% | 36.8% | 63.2% | 37.6% |
| 24 | 1994 | 34/35 | 6.1 | 4.0 | 60.1% | 75.5% | 50.2% | 63.0% | 40.6% | 65.5% | 36.4% | 2001 | 13/15 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 55.5% | 71.2% | 45.9% | 45.8% | 36.3% | 59.8% | 34.1% |
| 25 | 1995 | 61/66 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 59.5% | 73.7% | 53.2% | 64.8% | 37.0% | 65.3% | 35.9% | 2002 | 10/11 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 53.9% | 69.8% | 43.4% | 49.0% | 29.6% | 57.9% | 37.0% |
| 26 | 1996 | 61/63 | 6.5 | 5.1 | 55.7% | 75.7% | 51.2% | 65.5% | 39.7% | 64.8% | 35.9% | 2003 | 26/26 | 7.3 | 4.2 | 54.5% | 73.8% | 45.2% | 63.5% | 42.7% | 60.7% | 36.5% |
| 27 | 1997 | 38/45 | 7.7 | 5.0 | 56.5% | 74.2% | 52.0% | 66.9% | 45.4% | 64.4% | 35.1% | 2004 | 6/6 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 48.7% | 73.2% | 49.4% | 40.7% | 26.3% | 60.7% | 35.9% |
| 28 | 1998 | 48/62 | 8.3 | 4.6 | 58.0% | 77.7% | 52.2% | 65.2% | 43.2% | 66.9% | 34.3% | 2005 | 17/17 | 11.4 | 4.9 | 56.8% | 77.1% | 52.2% | 59.4% | 40.1% | 66.2% | 35.8% |
| 29 | 1999 | 30/42 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 55.5% | 73.7% | 50.1% | 56.9% | 38.4% | 63.1% | 32.6% | 2006 | 34/34 | 7.0 | 2.9 | 56.6% | 72.4% | 47.8% | 63.7% | 36.2% | 61.7% | 34.9% |
| 30 | 2000 | 17/21 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 54.9% | 73.6% | 46.0% | 64.2% | 28.0% | 61.4% | 33.6% | 2007 | 13/13 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 57.1% | 65.3% | 43.1% | 49.5% | 26.4% | 55.8% | 29.5% |
| 31 | 2001 | 26/29 | 7.2 | 5.9 | 52.8% | 75.6% | 48.7% | 56.6% | 34.2% | 62.7% | 32.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 2/2 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 54.2% | 76.2% | 50.9% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 64.8% | 27.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 448/523 | 6.6 | 4.6 | 56.3% | 75.1% | 51.3% | 62.8% | 40.0% | 64.6% | 35.2% | — | 259/278 | 6.8 | 4.4 | 57.4% | 72.4% | 47.1% | 55.6% | 38.2% | 61.5% | 35.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1530 | 110.0 | -1.36 | +1.92 | 0.750 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 37.5% | -0.63 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.13 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1510 | 118.9 | +0.13 | +0.36 | 0.915 | 48.2% | +28 | — | — | 29.6% | -0.93 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | -0.63 |
| 20 | 1990 | 1541 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 52.6% | -0.05 | 1–0 | — | — | +1.03 | 1997 | 1630 | 134.5 | -1.35 | -0.78 | 0.909 | 48.5% | +30 | — | -55 | 43.3% | -0.47 | 7–6 (54%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | +0.60 |
| 21 | 1991 | 1757 | 143.1 | +3.22 | -0.58 | 1.074 | 51.5% | +40 | -248 | -209 | 55.7% | +0.44 | 11–10 (52%) | 14–13 (52%) | — | -0.39 | 1998 | 1661 | 129.0 | +0.39 | +1.22 | 1.052 | 50.8% | -10 | -75 | -71 | 50.7% | +0.12 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–9 (31%) | — | -0.12 |
| 22 | 1992 | 1741 | 139.7 | +1.78 | -2.28 | 0.929 | 49.2% | +31 | -264 | -201 | 43.8% | -0.47 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | -2.48 | 1999 | 1645 | 137.7 | -0.21 | -1.19 | 0.949 | 49.1% | +36 | -75 | -122 | 45.0% | -0.28 | 3–10 (23%) | 7–12 (37%) | — | -1.22 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1669 | 136.6 | +2.63 | -1.58 | 1.020 | 50.4% | +20 | -120 | -143 | 50.0% | +0.11 | 8–11 (42%) | 13–14 (48%) | — | +0.60 | 2000 | 1675 | 126.8 | +0.05 | +0.25 | 1.022 | 50.4% | +34 | -174 | -115 | 47.5% | -0.40 | 5–7 (42%) | 10–6 (63%) | — | +0.17 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1686 | 139.2 | +3.09 | -0.26 | 1.054 | 50.9% | -6 | -131 | — | 48.8% | +0.01 | 3–7 (30%) | 8–8 (50%) | — | -1.29 | 2001 | 1596 | 108.5 | -1.35 | -2.71 | 0.849 | 47.0% | +17 | — | -76 | 29.3% | -1.39 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +0.32 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1768 | 149.5 | +3.33 | -1.32 | 1.035 | 50.6% | -12 | -116 | -191 | 54.4% | +0.22 | 11–8 (58%) | 12–7 (63%) | — | -2.79 | 2002 | 1620 | 119.3 | -1.95 | +1.16 | 0.880 | 46.9% | +9 | — | -59 | 40.7% | -0.81 | 2–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.03 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1862 | 148.8 | +2.53 | -0.73 | 1.019 | 50.6% | -13 | -212 | -147 | 54.0% | +0.10 | 11–10 (52%) | 30–16 (65%) | — | -1.35 | 2003 | 1532 | 117.2 | -2.07 | -0.87 | 0.929 | 48.9% | +13 | — | +76 | 40.0% | -0.51 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | +1.70 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1739 | 137.7 | +1.77 | -1.30 | 0.987 | 50.2% | +24 | -75 | -78 | 43.8% | -0.28 | 7–12 (37%) | 12–13 (48%) | — | -0.14 | 2004 | 1507 | 110.1 | -0.55 | -0.52 | 0.913 | 47.3% | +4 | — | — | 23.1% | -1.69 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | -0.42 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1810 | 145.1 | +3.80 | -2.09 | 1.038 | 50.9% | +13 | -234 | -13 | 57.3% | +0.46 | 15–7 (68%) | 14–16 (47%) | — | -0.24 | 2005 | 1596 | 127.5 | +2.04 | +0.31 | 1.059 | 51.1% | -56 | — | +71 | 48.9% | +0.08 | 2–5 (29%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | -0.05 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1654 | 132.5 | +1.25 | -2.98 | 0.884 | 48.1% | +56 | -141 | +72 | 42.6% | -0.49 | 6–7 (46%) | 7–9 (44%) | — | +0.21 | 2006 | 1606 | 122.4 | -0.69 | -1.72 | 0.913 | 49.0% | -77 | -132 | +106 | 44.9% | -0.32 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | +0.54 |
| 30 | 2000 | 1573 | 115.4 | -0.13 | -3.10 | 0.870 | 47.9% | +66 | -41 | +96 | 37.0% | -0.83 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +0.50 | 2007 | 1537 | 116.4 | -4.94 | -3.75 | 0.668 | 43.5% | -37 | — | +128 | 10.0% | -2.37 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.45 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1564 | 122.8 | +0.45 | -4.28 | 0.859 | 47.7% | +102 | -52 | +33 | 38.7% | -0.73 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–11 (35%) | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 1531 | 102.5 | -1.57 | -0.36 | 0.773 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1902 | 144.8 | +2.44 | -1.62 | 0.993 | 50.1% | +20 | -133 | -71 | 49.5% | -0.03 | 89–89 (50%) | 131–118 (53%) | 104.4 | -1.24 | — | 1722 | 132.5 | -0.75 | -0.68 | 0.933 | 48.8% | +5 | -103 | -6 | 41.7% | -0.51 | 35–56 (38%) | 51–68 (43%) | 92.8 | +0.10 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | 5 | 4 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 5 | 4 | 9 | Feb 25, 1999 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 6 | 3 | 9 | Oct 4, 1998 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Magnus Larsson | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 3, 2001 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jan 6, 2005 | H2H |
| Vincent Spadea | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 12, 2007 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 22, 2000 | H2H |
| Jonas Bjorkman | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 2007 | H2H |
| Mark Philippoussis | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 16, 2006 | H2H |