H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Jan Siemerink vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 0-1
Leonardo Lavalle holds a 1–0 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1992 Barcelona Olympics second round 6-4 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1992* | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Clay | Leonardo Lavalle | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,902 | 261 | 262 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 64 | 98 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #64 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #57 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #99 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–28 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,861 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,572 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,531 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |