H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Jan Siemerink vs M. Hipfl H2H: 2-0
Jan Siemerink holds a 2–0 lead over M. Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1999 Indianapolis second round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1999 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jan Siemerink | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | M. Hipfl | Match data |
| Oct 10, 1996* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 6-0 | M. Hipfl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| M. Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | M. Hipfl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |