H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Siemerink vs Mats Wilander H2H: 0-2
Mats Wilander holds a 2–0 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1995 New Haven third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1995* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mats Wilander | 6-4 6-4 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Mats Wilander | 6-4 6-2 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,262 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,246 | 2 | 13 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,177 | 3 | 16 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,108 | 4 | 19 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,056 | 4 | 21 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,082 | 4 | 26 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,152 | 7 | 32 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,922 | 7 | 32 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,894 | 7 | 33 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,695 | 7 | 33 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,652 | 7 | 33 |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,766 | 7 | 33 |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,679 | 7 | 33 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |