Jan Siemerink
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | 5 | 4 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 5 | 4 | 9 | Feb 25, 1999 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 6 | 3 | 9 | Oct 4, 1998 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Magnus Larsson | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 3, 2001 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Jan Siemerink holds a 3–1 lead over Paul Haarhuis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paul Haarhuis leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1999 Halle Open round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data | Jun 10, 1999* | R32 | Halle Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Grass |
| Paul Haarhuis | 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | Jan Siemerink | Match data | Oct 30, 1996* | R64 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Carpet |
| Jan Siemerink | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data | Aug 25, 1995* | R16 | Long Island | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jan Siemerink | 6-3 6-3 | Paul Haarhuis | Match data | Jul 27, 1995* | R32 | Dutch Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,902 | 261 | 262 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Paul Haarhuis | #623 | #18 | 1,341 | 1,887 | 251 | 247 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #57 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–28 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,861 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #42 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #37 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,573 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 30–28 | 51.7% | #25 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,531 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 1990 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1989 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1994 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 25 | 1995 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1991 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 26 | 1996 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 1992 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 27 | 1997 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1993 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 28 | 1998 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 1994 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% |
| 29 | 1999 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1995 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% |
| 30 | 2000 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 31 | 2001 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 32 | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 129 | 121 | 250 | 51.6% | 29 | 50 | 79 | 36.7% | 28 | 30 | 58 | 48.3% | 75 | 61 | 136 | 55.1% | — | 111 | 98 | 209 | 53.1% | 56 | 70 | 126 | 44.4% | 28 | 25 | 53 | 52.8% | 56 | 54 | 110 | 50.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/514 of Jan Siemerink's and 380/436 of Paul Haarhuis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 1991 | 48/51 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 52.3% | 75.3% | 53.3% | 58.8% | 44.6% | 64.8% | 37.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 42/49 | 6.2 | 4.2 | 54.6% | 72.8% | 50.4% | 63.1% | 36.0% | 62.7% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 41/49 | 6.4 | 4.0 | 56.6% | 76.6% | 50.8% | 62.6% | 44.2% | 65.2% | 35.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1994 | 34/35 | 6.1 | 4.0 | 60.1% | 75.5% | 50.2% | 63.0% | 40.6% | 65.5% | 36.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1995 | 61/66 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 59.5% | 73.7% | 53.2% | 64.8% | 37.0% | 65.3% | 35.9% | 1991 | 44/50 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 58.4% | 68.3% | 52.1% | 45.9% | 48.3% | 61.5% | 40.2% |
| 26 | 1996 | 61/63 | 6.5 | 5.1 | 55.7% | 75.7% | 51.2% | 65.5% | 39.7% | 64.8% | 35.9% | 1992 | 55/62 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 59.8% | 70.2% | 51.8% | 63.1% | 41.7% | 62.7% | 38.0% |
| 27 | 1997 | 38/45 | 7.7 | 5.0 | 56.5% | 74.2% | 52.0% | 66.9% | 45.4% | 64.4% | 35.1% | 1993 | 51/56 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 59.5% | 69.2% | 52.2% | 60.9% | 43.4% | 62.2% | 38.2% |
| 28 | 1998 | 48/62 | 8.3 | 4.6 | 58.0% | 77.7% | 52.2% | 65.2% | 43.2% | 66.9% | 34.3% | 1994 | 43/48 | 4.2 | 2.0 | 59.7% | 68.8% | 50.0% | 64.0% | 48.8% | 61.1% | 37.1% |
| 29 | 1999 | 30/42 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 55.5% | 73.7% | 50.1% | 56.9% | 38.4% | 63.1% | 32.6% | 1995 | 55/57 | 4.6 | 2.6 | 59.8% | 68.3% | 50.7% | 54.3% | 40.4% | 61.0% | 36.3% |
| 30 | 2000 | 17/21 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 54.9% | 73.6% | 46.0% | 64.2% | 28.0% | 61.4% | 33.6% | 1996 | 48/58 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 62.5% | 68.2% | 51.8% | 50.8% | 44.9% | 62.2% | 35.8% |
| 31 | 2001 | 26/29 | 7.2 | 5.9 | 52.8% | 75.6% | 48.7% | 56.6% | 34.2% | 62.7% | 32.1% | 1997 | 37/44 | 5.3 | 2.8 | 59.7% | 71.9% | 51.2% | 59.4% | 46.1% | 63.5% | 37.4% |
| 32 | 2002 | 2/2 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 54.2% | 76.2% | 50.9% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 64.8% | 27.2% | 1998 | 30/40 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 56.4% | 71.4% | 50.5% | 60.7% | 45.0% | 62.5% | 36.0% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 17/21 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 61.5% | 68.9% | 48.6% | 61.8% | 29.9% | 61.0% | 36.2% |
| Career | — | 448/523 | 6.6 | 4.6 | 56.3% | 75.1% | 51.3% | 62.8% | 40.0% | 64.6% | 35.2% | — | 380/498 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 59.7% | 69.4% | 51.2% | 57.5% | 43.9% | 62.0% | 37.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Paul Haarhuis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 1990 | 1541 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 52.6% | -0.05 | 1–0 | — | — | +1.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 1757 | 143.1 | +3.22 | -0.58 | 1.074 | 51.5% | +40 | -248 | -209 | 55.7% | +0.44 | 11–10 (52%) | 14–13 (52%) | 103.1 | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 1741 | 139.7 | +1.78 | -2.28 | 0.929 | 49.2% | +31 | -264 | -201 | 43.8% | -0.47 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–6 (63%) | 101.1 | -2.48 | 1988 | 1489 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1669 | 136.6 | +2.63 | -1.58 | 1.020 | 50.4% | +20 | -120 | -143 | 50.0% | +0.11 | 8–11 (42%) | 13–14 (48%) | 93.9 | +0.60 | 1989 | 1636 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | -19 | -43 | — | 54.3% | +0.30 | 1–2 (33%) | 5–2 (71%) | 101.8 | +0.52 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1686 | 139.2 | +3.09 | -0.26 | 1.054 | 50.9% | -6 | -131 | — | 48.8% | +0.01 | 3–7 (30%) | 8–8 (50%) | 97.2 | -1.29 | 1990 | 1670 | 140.9 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -37 | -64 | 46.9% | -0.14 | 6–8 (43%) | 9–12 (43%) | 100.3 | -1.33 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1768 | 149.5 | +3.33 | -1.32 | 1.035 | 50.6% | -12 | -116 | -191 | 54.4% | +0.22 | 11–8 (58%) | 12–7 (63%) | 111.6 | -2.79 | 1991 | 1730 | 144.8 | +0.85 | +1.66 | 1.042 | 50.8% | +15 | -61 | -171 | 51.1% | +0.31 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–5 (55%) | 102.5 | -2.69 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1862 | 148.8 | +2.53 | -0.73 | 1.019 | 50.6% | -13 | -212 | -147 | 54.0% | +0.10 | 11–10 (52%) | 30–16 (65%) | 109.9 | -1.35 | 1992 | 1685 | 143.9 | +1.01 | +0.37 | 1.019 | 50.2% | +33 | -24 | — | 50.3% | +0.07 | 9–8 (53%) | 12–15 (44%) | 99.9 | -0.46 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1739 | 137.7 | +1.77 | -1.30 | 0.987 | 50.2% | +24 | -75 | -78 | 43.8% | -0.28 | 7–12 (37%) | 12–13 (48%) | 97.6 | -0.14 | 1993 | 1764 | 141.2 | +1.06 | +0.08 | 1.010 | 50.5% | -19 | +4 | -232 | 53.5% | +0.17 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.1 | -0.40 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1810 | 145.1 | +3.80 | -2.09 | 1.038 | 50.9% | +13 | -234 | -13 | 57.3% | +0.46 | 15–7 (68%) | 14–16 (47%) | 103.5 | -0.24 | 1994 | 1715 | 147.9 | +0.13 | -0.29 | 0.953 | 49.4% | +46 | +62 | — | 50.8% | -0.08 | 10–4 (71%) | 8–9 (47%) | 104.6 | -1.32 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1654 | 132.5 | +1.25 | -2.98 | 0.884 | 48.1% | +56 | -141 | +72 | 42.6% | -0.49 | 6–7 (46%) | 7–9 (44%) | 96.5 | +0.21 | 1995 | 1716 | 137.5 | -0.59 | -0.36 | 0.931 | 48.7% | +46 | -19 | -93 | 50.0% | -0.17 | 18–5 (78%) | 11–12 (48%) | 106.7 | +0.15 |
| 30 | 2000 | 1573 | 115.4 | -0.13 | -3.10 | 0.870 | 47.9% | +66 | -41 | +96 | 37.0% | -0.83 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–2 (67%) | 98.7 | +0.50 | 1996 | 1736 | 139.0 | +0.20 | -0.84 | 0.946 | 49.0% | +10 | -47 | -15 | 46.6% | -0.19 | 12–5 (71%) | 13–16 (45%) | 105.2 | +0.88 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1564 | 122.8 | +0.45 | -4.28 | 0.859 | 47.7% | +102 | -52 | +33 | 38.7% | -0.73 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–11 (35%) | 101.1 | -0.11 | 1997 | 1675 | 138.9 | +1.41 | -0.41 | 1.025 | 50.4% | -16 | -7 | +99 | 48.7% | +0.13 | 5–13 (28%) | 14–12 (54%) | 93.4 | -0.68 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1531 | 102.5 | -1.57 | -0.36 | 0.773 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.01 | 1998 | 1660 | 132.7 | +0.38 | -1.61 | 0.960 | 49.6% | +19 | -37 | +79 | 48.4% | +0.07 | 8–5 (62%) | 6–7 (46%) | 103.3 | +1.10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1620 | 127.7 | -0.68 | -0.73 | 0.928 | 48.6% | +35 | -73 | +103 | 42.4% | -0.44 | 0–6 (0%) | 2–7 (22%) | 89.4 | -1.04 |
| Career | — | 1902 | 144.8 | +2.44 | -1.62 | 0.993 | 50.1% | +20 | -133 | -71 | 49.5% | -0.03 | 89–89 (50%) | 131–118 (53%) | 104.4 | -1.24 | — | 1888 | 146.0 | +0.48 | -0.13 | 0.982 | 49.8% | +17 | -22 | -15 | 49.4% | 0.00 | 84–71 (54%) | 97–108 (47%) | 102.8 | -1.05 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | 5 | 4 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 5 | 4 | 9 | Feb 25, 1999 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 6 | 3 | 9 | Oct 4, 1998 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Magnus Larsson | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 3, 2001 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goran Ivanisevic | 7 | 5 | 12 | Jun 27, 1999 | H2H |
| Jeff Tarango | 4 | 5 | 9 | Mar 16, 1999 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 1 | 8 | 9 | Oct 10, 1998 | H2H |
| Thomas Muster | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 23, 1997 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 19, 1997 | H2H |