H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jan Siemerink vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 2-5

Richard Krajicek holds a 5–2 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1999 Miami Masters third round 6-3 6-2.

NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 18, 1999* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Richard Krajicek #7 6-3 6-2 Jan Siemerink #29 Match data
Mar 13, 1999* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Richard Krajicek #8 6-4 6-4 Jan Siemerink #32 Match data
Mar 7, 1998* Rotterdam ATP 250 SF Carpet Jan Siemerink #48 6-4 4-6 6-4 Richard Krajicek #10 Match data
Aug 17, 1996* New Haven ATP 250 QF Hard Jan Siemerink #32 7-6(3) 6-4 Richard Krajicek #8 Match data
Apr 27, 1995* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Richard Krajicek #15 3-6 6-3 6-4 Jan Siemerink #53 Match data
Mar 3, 1995* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Richard Krajicek #10 7-5 6-4 Jan Siemerink #53 Match data
Aug 31, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Richard Krajicek #31 7-6(2) 6-4 6-7(2) 6-7(8) 6-4 Jan Siemerink #100 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,908 261 260 50.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Siemerink Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 1992 22–26 45.8% #57 1,747 0 1 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,670 0 1 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,685 0 1 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,784 0 1 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 1996 35–27 56.5% #15 1,866 0 2 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
29 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,665 0 4
30 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,576 0 4 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,564 0 4 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,532 0 4