Jan Siemerink
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | 5 | 4 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 5 | 4 | 9 | Feb 25, 1999 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 6 | 3 | 9 | Oct 4, 1998 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Magnus Larsson | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 3, 2001 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC
Richard Krajicek holds a 5–2 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1999 Miami Open round of 32 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Krajicek | 6-3 6-2 | Jan Siemerink | Match data | Mar 18, 1999* | R32 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Richard Krajicek | 6-4 6-4 | Jan Siemerink | Match data | Mar 13, 1999* | R16 | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Jan Siemerink | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data | Mar 7, 1998* | SF | ABN AMRO Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Jan Siemerink | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data | Aug 17, 1996* | QF | New Haven | Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
| Richard Krajicek | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Jan Siemerink | Match data | Apr 27, 1995* | R32 | Monte-Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Richard Krajicek | 7-5 6-4 | Jan Siemerink | Match data | Mar 3, 1995* | R16 | ABN AMRO Open | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Richard Krajicek | 7-6(2) 6-4 6-7(2) 6-7(8) 6-4 | Jan Siemerink | Match data | Aug 31, 1994* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,902 | 261 | 262 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,048 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 17 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #57 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,834 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,878 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,958 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–28 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,861 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,983 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,881 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,653 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,573 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,836 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,761 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,531 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 20 | 1990 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1992 | 28 | 10 | 38 | 73.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 21 | 1991 | 16 | 7 | 23 | 69.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 1993 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 22 | 1992 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 1994 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 23 | 1993 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 45.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1995 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 18 | 4 | 22 | 81.8% |
| 24 | 1994 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1996 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% |
| 25 | 1995 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1997 | 21 | 8 | 29 | 72.4% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% |
| 26 | 1996 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 1998 | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 27 | 1997 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1999 | 30 | 12 | 42 | 71.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 28 | 1998 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 2000 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | 1999 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 32 | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 129 | 121 | 250 | 51.6% | 29 | 50 | 79 | 36.7% | 28 | 30 | 58 | 48.3% | 75 | 61 | 136 | 55.1% | — | 189 | 91 | 280 | 67.5% | 76 | 43 | 119 | 63.9% | 63 | 26 | 89 | 70.8% | 80 | 47 | 127 | 63.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/514 of Jan Siemerink's and 530/615 of Richard Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 40/46 | 9.2 | 4.0 | 55.3% | 77.4% | 51.6% | 57.8% | 43.4% | 65.8% | 37.4% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 61/71 | 11.0 | 3.5 | 58.4% | 79.2% | 54.5% | 65.0% | 41.3% | 68.9% | 37.9% |
| 21 | 1991 | 48/51 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 52.3% | 75.3% | 53.3% | 58.8% | 44.6% | 64.8% | 37.8% | 1993 | 46/56 | 10.3 | 4.3 | 60.2% | 81.1% | 50.7% | 57.7% | 47.2% | 69.1% | 37.8% |
| 22 | 1992 | 42/49 | 6.2 | 4.2 | 54.6% | 72.8% | 50.4% | 63.1% | 36.0% | 62.7% | 34.7% | 1994 | 42/45 | 11.7 | 4.0 | 55.0% | 81.2% | 50.6% | 70.8% | 47.6% | 67.7% | 38.1% |
| 23 | 1993 | 41/49 | 6.4 | 4.0 | 56.6% | 76.6% | 50.8% | 62.6% | 44.2% | 65.2% | 35.5% | 1995 | 54/60 | 11.5 | 3.1 | 59.0% | 79.1% | 51.2% | 70.1% | 41.8% | 67.7% | 36.1% |
| 24 | 1994 | 34/35 | 6.1 | 4.0 | 60.1% | 75.5% | 50.2% | 63.0% | 40.6% | 65.5% | 36.4% | 1996 | 61/70 | 12.8 | 3.4 | 58.1% | 82.1% | 49.2% | 60.1% | 41.1% | 68.2% | 37.3% |
| 25 | 1995 | 61/66 | 5.4 | 3.4 | 59.5% | 73.7% | 53.2% | 64.8% | 37.0% | 65.3% | 35.9% | 1997 | 61/69 | 14.3 | 3.1 | 57.8% | 85.0% | 53.3% | 65.0% | 43.2% | 71.7% | 37.3% |
| 26 | 1996 | 61/63 | 6.5 | 5.1 | 55.7% | 75.7% | 51.2% | 65.5% | 39.7% | 64.8% | 35.9% | 1998 | 50/61 | 14.9 | 3.4 | 59.8% | 82.3% | 53.6% | 57.2% | 44.1% | 70.7% | 36.9% |
| 27 | 1997 | 38/45 | 7.7 | 5.0 | 56.5% | 74.2% | 52.0% | 66.9% | 45.4% | 64.4% | 35.1% | 1999 | 47/62 | 13.4 | 2.8 | 61.1% | 82.0% | 52.2% | 64.0% | 43.5% | 70.4% | 37.8% |
| 28 | 1998 | 48/62 | 8.3 | 4.6 | 58.0% | 77.7% | 52.2% | 65.2% | 43.2% | 66.9% | 34.3% | 2000 | 35/41 | 14.9 | 3.4 | 58.6% | 82.2% | 55.1% | 59.5% | 35.2% | 71.0% | 36.7% |
| 29 | 1999 | 30/42 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 55.5% | 73.7% | 50.1% | 56.9% | 38.4% | 63.1% | 32.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 17/21 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 54.9% | 73.6% | 46.0% | 64.2% | 28.0% | 61.4% | 33.6% | 2002 | 12/13 | 15.7 | 6.6 | 53.3% | 81.8% | 49.0% | 67.7% | 43.4% | 66.1% | 34.1% |
| 31 | 2001 | 26/29 | 7.2 | 5.9 | 52.8% | 75.6% | 48.7% | 56.6% | 34.2% | 62.7% | 32.1% | 2003 | 21/21 | 12.9 | 5.4 | 52.1% | 79.9% | 48.0% | 67.4% | 45.6% | 64.4% | 34.7% |
| 32 | 2002 | 2/2 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 54.2% | 76.2% | 50.9% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 64.8% | 27.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1746 | 141.4 | +4.23 | -0.01 | 1.092 | 51.2% | -23 | -142 | -131 | 56.0% | +0.54 | 9–9 (50%) | 10–12 (45%) | 101.8 | -1.45 |
| 20 | 1990 | 1541 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 52.6% | -0.05 | 1–0 | — | — | +1.03 | 1992 | 1949 | 161.3 | +6.70 | +1.48 | 1.220 | 53.2% | +15 | -266 | -275 | 63.5% | +0.94 | 14–9 (61%) | 18–17 (51%) | 104.9 | -1.66 |
| 21 | 1991 | 1757 | 143.1 | +3.22 | -0.58 | 1.074 | 51.5% | +40 | -248 | -209 | 55.7% | +0.44 | 11–10 (52%) | 14–13 (52%) | 103.1 | -0.39 | 1993 | 1885 | 155.4 | +6.73 | +0.19 | 1.222 | 53.3% | -30 | +5 | -123 | 60.6% | +0.72 | 11–8 (58%) | 14–15 (48%) | 98.9 | -1.17 |
| 22 | 1992 | 1741 | 139.7 | +1.78 | -2.28 | 0.929 | 49.2% | +31 | -264 | -201 | 43.8% | -0.47 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–6 (63%) | 101.1 | -2.48 | 1994 | 1883 | 152.7 | +5.16 | +0.47 | 1.178 | 52.9% | -19 | +63 | -64 | 69.4% | +1.08 | 2–6 (25%) | 12–12 (50%) | 93.0 | +0.23 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1669 | 136.6 | +2.63 | -1.58 | 1.020 | 50.4% | +20 | -120 | -143 | 50.0% | +0.11 | 8–11 (42%) | 13–14 (48%) | 93.9 | +0.60 | 1995 | 1835 | 148.6 | +4.66 | -0.97 | 1.118 | 51.8% | +66 | +23 | -81 | 64.6% | +0.80 | 11–8 (58%) | 16–15 (52%) | 98.8 | +1.78 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1686 | 139.2 | +3.09 | -0.26 | 1.054 | 50.9% | -6 | -131 | — | 48.8% | +0.01 | 3–7 (30%) | 8–8 (50%) | 97.2 | -1.29 | 1996 | 1879 | 156.6 | +5.72 | +0.26 | 1.174 | 52.7% | -76 | +74 | +133 | 64.5% | +0.84 | 11–4 (73%) | 22–16 (58%) | 108.1 | +0.05 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1768 | 149.5 | +3.33 | -1.32 | 1.035 | 50.6% | -12 | -116 | -191 | 54.4% | +0.22 | 11–8 (58%) | 12–7 (63%) | 111.6 | -2.79 | 1997 | 1958 | 153.7 | +8.64 | +0.43 | 1.320 | 54.0% | -8 | -40 | +49 | 69.5% | +1.20 | 8–6 (57%) | 20–22 (48%) | 98.1 | -0.46 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1862 | 148.8 | +2.53 | -0.73 | 1.019 | 50.6% | -13 | -212 | -147 | 54.0% | +0.10 | 11–10 (52%) | 30–16 (65%) | 109.9 | -1.35 | 1998 | 1984 | 154.9 | +7.61 | +0.20 | 1.259 | 53.5% | -7 | -50 | +57 | 69.1% | +1.13 | 17–6 (74%) | 24–12 (67%) | 107.8 | +0.64 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1739 | 137.7 | +1.77 | -1.30 | 0.987 | 50.2% | +24 | -75 | -78 | 43.8% | -0.28 | 7–12 (37%) | 12–13 (48%) | 97.6 | -0.14 | 1999 | 1881 | 155.6 | +6.78 | +0.75 | 1.279 | 53.6% | +61 | -29 | +52 | 66.0% | +1.16 | 5–7 (42%) | 12–15 (44%) | 89.7 | +0.83 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1810 | 145.1 | +3.80 | -2.09 | 1.038 | 50.9% | +13 | -234 | -13 | 57.3% | +0.46 | 15–7 (68%) | 14–16 (47%) | 103.5 | -0.24 | 2000 | 1880 | 150.8 | +7.72 | -0.11 | 1.266 | 53.1% | +52 | -32 | +50 | 61.1% | +0.86 | 5–4 (56%) | 8–12 (40%) | 94.8 | -1.68 |
| 29 | 1999 | 1654 | 132.5 | +1.25 | -2.98 | 0.884 | 48.1% | +56 | -141 | +72 | 42.6% | -0.49 | 6–7 (46%) | 7–9 (44%) | 96.5 | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 1573 | 115.4 | -0.13 | -3.10 | 0.870 | 47.9% | +66 | -41 | +96 | 37.0% | -0.83 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–2 (67%) | 98.7 | +0.50 | 2002 | 1837 | 125.9 | +3.14 | -0.36 | 1.008 | 50.0% | +25 | — | +75 | 59.5% | +0.32 | 2–3 (40%) | 5–3 (63%) | 98.6 | -0.73 |
| 31 | 2001 | 1564 | 122.8 | +0.45 | -4.28 | 0.859 | 47.7% | +102 | -52 | +33 | 38.7% | -0.73 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–11 (35%) | 101.1 | -0.11 | 2003 | 1762 | 123.4 | +1.62 | -1.25 | 0.973 | 49.6% | +3 | +73 | +168 | 48.1% | +0.06 | 5–2 (71%) | 5–8 (38%) | 98.1 | -0.47 |
| 32 | 2002 | 1531 | 102.5 | -1.57 | -0.36 | 0.773 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1902 | 144.8 | +2.44 | -1.62 | 0.993 | 50.1% | +20 | -133 | -71 | 49.5% | -0.03 | 89–89 (50%) | 131–118 (53%) | 104.4 | -1.24 | — | 2049 | 158.4 | +6.18 | +0.22 | 1.195 | 52.8% | +5 | -20 | +4 | 63.9% | +0.89 | 100–72 (58%) | 166–159 (51%) | 99.5 | -0.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianluca Pozzi | 5 | 4 | 9 | Jun 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 5 | 4 | 9 | Feb 25, 1999 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 6 | 3 | 9 | Oct 4, 1998 | H2H |
| Stefan Edberg | 2 | 6 | 8 | Oct 12, 1996 | H2H |
| Magnus Larsson | 2 | 5 | 7 | May 3, 2001 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Stich | 6 | 7 | 13 | Apr 24, 1997 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 3 | 8 | 11 | Nov 1, 1998 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 4 | 6 | 10 | Oct 27, 2000 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 7 | 3 | 10 | Aug 3, 2000 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 5 | 4 | 9 | Sep 8, 2000 | H2H |