H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Siemerink vs Sandon Stolle H2H: 2-2
Jan Siemerink and Sandon Stolle are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sandon Stolle leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jan Siemerink leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Siemerink won the 1996 New Haven third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1996* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan Siemerink | 7-5 6-2 | Sandon Stolle | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1996* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sandon Stolle | 6-3 6-7(1) 6-2 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1996* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Jan Siemerink | 6-3 7-6(0) | Sandon Stolle | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1993* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Sandon Stolle | 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | Jan Siemerink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Siemerink | #987 | #14 | 1,863 | 1,908 | 261 | 260 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sandon Stolle | #1,379 | #50 | 810 | 1,745 | 100 | 120 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Siemerink | Sandon Stolle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #228 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #135 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #26 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #71 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #57 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #182 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #81 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #179 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #83 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #78 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #375 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #88 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,532 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |