H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jan Siemerink vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 2-4

Todd Woodbridge holds a 4–2 lead over Jan Siemerink in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 2000 Indianapolis second round 6-3 6-1.

NED Age 56 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 2000 Indianapolis ATP 250 R64 Hard Todd Woodbridge #153 6-3 6-1 Jan Siemerink #102 Match data
Jun 28, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Todd Woodbridge #171 6-4 3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 Jan Siemerink #123 Match data
Jan 19, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Todd Woodbridge #204 6-4 6-1 6-3 Jan Siemerink #93 Match data
Oct 20, 1995* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Carpet Todd Woodbridge #45 6-4 7-5 Jan Siemerink #18 Match data
Aug 26, 1995* Long Island ATP 250 QF Hard Jan Siemerink #31 6-4 6-2 Todd Woodbridge #37 Match data
Apr 2, 1992* Singapore ATP 250 R32 Hard Jan Siemerink #44 6-3 4-6 6-4 Todd Woodbridge #72 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jan Siemerink #987 #14 1,863 1,908 261 260 50.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,857 237 229 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Siemerink Todd Woodbridge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0
18 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0
19 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0
20 1990 5–4 55.6% #135 1,541 0 0 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,702 0 0
21 1991 30–21 58.8% #26 1,756 0 1 1992 25–22 53.2% #54 1,684 0 0
22 1992 22–26 45.8% #57 1,747 0 1 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,664 0 0
23 1993 24–25 49.0% #53 1,670 0 1 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,661 0 0
24 1994 16–19 45.7% #81 1,685 0 1 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,810 0 1
25 1995 37–29 56.1% #21 1,784 0 1 1996 32–23 58.2% #36 1,744 0 1
26 1996 35–27 56.5% #15 1,866 0 2 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,796 0 2
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #78 1,738 0 2 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,714 0 2
28 1998 38–24 61.3% #19 1,809 0 4 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,601 0 2
29 1999 17–25 40.5% #88 1,665 0 4 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2
30 2000 7–14 33.3% #104 1,576 0 4 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,596 0 2
31 2001 12–17 41.4% #127 1,564 0 4
32 2002 0–2 0.0% #438 1,532 0 4