H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Janko Tipsarevic vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 3-3

Janko Tipsarevic and Andreas Seppi are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Janko Tipsarevic leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Andreas Seppi leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2017 Winston-Salem second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Andreas Seppi
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 22, 2017* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R64 Hard Andreas Seppi #86 6-2 6-2 Janko Tipsarevic #66 Match data
Jun 30, 2017* Antalya ATP 250 R16 Grass Andreas Seppi #102 3-6 6-4 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #61 Match data
Jun 18, 2011* Eastbourne ATP 250 F Grass Andreas Seppi #51 7-6(5) 3-6 5-3 (ret.) Janko Tipsarevic #30 Match data
Feb 24, 2010* Dubai ATP 500 R32 Hard Janko Tipsarevic #39 7-6(4) 7-5 Andreas Seppi #45 Match data
Mar 21, 2007* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Janko Tipsarevic #98 7-5 7-5 Andreas Seppi #93 Match data
Jan 18, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Janko Tipsarevic #137 1-6 6-4 4-6 6-2 6-4 Andreas Seppi #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,072 245 240 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,977 363 397 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janko Tipsarevic Andreas Seppi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0
20 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,551 0 0 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,591 0 0
21 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,543 0 0 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,684 0 0
22 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0
24 2008 24–21 53.3% #49 1,727 0 0 2008 27–27 50.0% #35 1,748 0 0
25 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,818 0 0 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,754 0 0
26 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,807 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,719 0 0
27 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,006 0 2 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,806 0 1
28 2012 48–26 64.9% #9 1,972 0 3 2012 35–24 59.3% #23 1,921 0 3
29 2013 19–22 46.3% #36 1,778 0 4 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,831 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2014 22–27 44.9% #45 1,774 0 3
31 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,693 0 4 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,870 0 3
32 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,748 0 4 2016 18–23 43.9% #87 1,794 0 3
33 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,666 0 4 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,740 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,783 0 3
35 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,750 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,653 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,652 0 3
38 — — — — — — — 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,606 0 3