H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 0-1
Fernando Vicente holds a 1–0 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 2005 Roland Garros second round 6-3 1-6 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | 6-3 1-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Fernando Vicente | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |