H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 2-1
Janko Tipsarevic holds a 2–1 lead over Jose Acasuso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2009 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2009* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-3 6-4 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2009* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2007* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-4 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |