H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Michael Llodra H2H: 1-2
Michael Llodra holds a 2–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Llodra leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Michael Llodra won the 2013 Montpellier fourth round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2013* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Michael Llodra | 6-3 7-6(4) | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2012* | Marseille | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Michael Llodra | 6-4 7-6(10) | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2007* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-2 7-6(6) | Michael Llodra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Michael Llodra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |