H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Janko Tipsarevic vs Nicolas Almagro H2H: 0-2

Nicolas Almagro holds a 2–0 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2013 Australian Open fourth round 6-2 5-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Almagro #11 6-2 5-1 (ret.) Janko Tipsarevic #9 Match data Jan 22, 2013* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Nicolas Almagro #13 6-4 6-4 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #8 Match data Jun 5, 2012* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,069 248 243 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janko Tipsarevic Nicolas Almagro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,553 0 0 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,544 0 0 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4
23 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5
24 2008 25–22 53.2% #49 1,733 0 0 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7
25 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,822 0 0 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10
26 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,809 0 0 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12
27 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,008 0 2 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12
28 2012 50–27 64.9% #9 1,970 0 3 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12
29 2013 19–23 45.2% #36 1,768 0 4 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13
31 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,687 0 4 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13
32 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,747 0 4 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13
33 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,664 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Janko Tipsarevic Nicolas Almagro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2004 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2005 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2007 8 12 20 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 2008 16 15 31 51.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2010 18 17 35 51.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 2011 38 17 55 69.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
28 2012 29 18 47 61.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — —
29 2013 15 15 30 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 159 142 301 52.8% 49 61 110 44.5% 38 34 72 52.8% 2 6 8 25.0% — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 484/491 of Janko Tipsarevic's and 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Janko Tipsarevic Nicolas Almagro
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8%
19 2003 3/3 6.0 1.7 54.3% 69.5% 55.6% 43.6% 40.6% 62.7% 34.5% 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6%
20 2004 9/9 7.7 3.3 58.4% 71.0% 46.0% 53.8% 30.4% 60.8% 36.4% 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7%
21 2005 22/22 5.7 3.1 51.9% 70.6% 51.3% 48.7% 34.1% 61.3% 34.8% 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7%
22 2006 25/25 7.1 2.2 57.1% 75.0% 49.3% 50.8% 34.2% 64.0% 34.1% 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0%
23 2007 38/38 8.0 2.7 55.2% 74.6% 47.1% 56.6% 43.5% 61.6% 32.1% 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3%
24 2008 44/47 9.3 2.6 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 52.5% 43.7% 64.8% 34.4% 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2%
25 2009 49/49 6.4 2.5 55.7% 73.8% 51.7% 57.1% 44.2% 63.9% 36.6% 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5%
26 2010 44/44 7.0 2.0 57.3% 72.7% 54.1% 60.0% 41.3% 64.7% 36.3% 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8%
27 2011 72/73 6.1 2.3 56.0% 76.7% 56.2% 61.0% 49.2% 67.6% 40.8% 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0%
28 2012 74/77 7.8 2.5 56.9% 75.3% 53.7% 60.1% 42.7% 66.0% 37.6% 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5%
29 2013 42/42 6.2 2.2 57.9% 71.8% 51.9% 64.7% 38.7% 63.3% 34.9% 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1%
31 2015 10/10 6.7 3.4 53.8% 71.1% 48.1% 54.1% 30.7% 60.5% 34.7% 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5%
32 2016 17/17 5.5 3.4 55.1% 74.4% 49.6% 60.7% 42.0% 63.5% 33.5% 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4%
33 2017 17/17 6.1 3.1 54.1% 70.6% 46.5% 48.8% 38.7% 59.6% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 18/18 5.3 2.8 58.7% 69.7% 48.4% 58.0% 39.6% 60.8% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 484/491 6.9 2.5 56.2% 73.9% 51.9% 57.6% 41.9% 64.1% 36.3% — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janko Tipsarevic Nicolas Almagro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 -0.67
19 2003 1565 113.0 -0.22 +0.55 0.924 48.2% +9 — — 28.6% -1.28 — 1–1 — -0.28 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) 90.7 +0.44
20 2004 1554 115.3 -1.04 -1.30 0.929 48.4% -23 — — 30.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.51 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 99.5 -2.25
21 2005 1545 121.5 -1.24 -1.36 0.900 48.0% -6 +49 +94 35.0% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 4–7 (36%) 97.8 +0.44 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) 97.9 +1.58
22 2006 1557 119.7 +1.24 -1.88 0.947 48.5% +8 -55 +107 38.2% -0.88 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 100.9 -0.13 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) 96.6 +1.82
23 2007 1735 133.6 -0.76 -2.94 0.836 46.9% -60 -192 +8 46.9% -0.29 8–5 (62%) 7–9 (44%) 105.4 -1.63 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) 98.1 +0.28
24 2008 1734 143.1 +1.16 -1.11 0.978 49.7% -22 -145 +100 55.6% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 17–14 (55%) 108.6 +1.14 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) 105.3 +0.21
25 2009 1822 147.5 +0.76 +0.05 1.011 50.4% -6 -158 +1 54.8% +0.23 4–9 (31%) 12–9 (57%) 97.8 -1.85 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) 100.1 +2.38
26 2010 1809 151.3 +1.01 +0.14 1.028 50.6% +32 — -18 53.3% +0.22 3–6 (33%) 11–8 (58%) 99.7 +0.29 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) 102.7 +1.39
27 2011 2008 161.8 +4.65 +3.68 1.259 53.8% +27 -302 -174 67.9% +1.30 9–9 (50%) 17–15 (53%) 99.0 +2.83 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) 97.7 +3.89
28 2012 1971 166.2 +3.35 +1.51 1.105 51.6% -5 +2 -70 63.4% +0.64 13–10 (57%) 22–12 (65%) 109.2 +3.81 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 100.0 -0.08
29 2013 1768 146.7 +0.25 -1.48 0.952 49.4% +60 +92 — 45.7% -0.06 8–4 (67%) 5–13 (28%) 96.2 +2.99 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.2 -3.74
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) 95.5 +0.05
31 2015 1688 112.4 -1.37 -1.80 0.879 47.3% — +95 — 33.3% -1.15 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -0.32 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 100.9 -1.98
32 2016 1748 142.6 -0.09 -0.68 0.919 48.7% +53 — +20 42.9% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–8 (33%) 99.1 -0.57 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20
33 2017 1664 126.4 -2.04 -2.13 0.837 47.1% +89 +27 +28 35.9% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2019 1665 130.0 -2.14 +0.50 0.985 50.2% +38 +16 +26 45.8% -0.21 1–3 (25%) 3–8 (27%) 94.3 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2069 152.5 +1.24 +0.04 1.011 50.2% +11 -51 -1 52.0% +0.13 70–71 (50%) 118–120 (50%) 101.9 +1.46 — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.