H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Janko Tipsarevic vs Paul-Henri Mathieu H2H: 4-2

Janko Tipsarevic holds a 4–2 lead over Paul-Henri Mathieu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Janko Tipsarevic leads 2–0 on clay, while Paul-Henri Mathieu leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2012 Gstaad semifinal 7-6(10) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janko Tipsarevic
SRB Age 42 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Paul-Henri Mathieu
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 21, 2012* Gstaad ATP 250 SF Clay Janko Tipsarevic #8 7-6(10) 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #172 Match data
Jun 17, 2009* Eastbourne ATP 250 R32 Grass Janko Tipsarevic #52 6-4 6-2 Paul-Henri Mathieu #38 Match data
Oct 4, 2008* Metz ATP 250 QF Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #24 7-6(4) 6-3 Janko Tipsarevic #43 Match data
Apr 22, 2008* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Janko Tipsarevic #37 6-4 2-6 6-3 Paul-Henri Mathieu #12 Match data
Oct 12, 2006* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Janko Tipsarevic #75 7-6(8) 6-4 Paul-Henri Mathieu #53 Match data
Jan 6, 2005* Chennai ATP 250 R32 Hard Paul-Henri Mathieu #123 6-3 6-4 Janko Tipsarevic #117 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Janko Tipsarevic #755 #8 3,320 2,072 245 240 50.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Paul-Henri Mathieu #914 #12 2,000 1,961 268 297 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janko Tipsarevic Paul-Henri Mathieu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 2–3 40.0% #275 1,487 0 0
19 2003 1–2 33.3% #161 1,565 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #150 1,468 0 0
20 2004 2–7 22.2% #117 1,551 0 0 2002 23–14 62.2% #36 1,838 0 2
21 2005 7–15 31.8% #139 1,543 0 0 2003 16–23 41.0% #83 1,683 0 2
22 2006 8–17 32.0% #64 1,556 0 0 2004 9–10 47.4% #123 1,661 0 2
23 2007 17–21 44.7% #52 1,735 0 0 2005 26–27 49.1% #46 1,720 0 2
24 2008 24–21 53.3% #49 1,727 0 0 2006 23–28 45.1% #55 1,668 0 2
25 2009 26–23 53.1% #38 1,818 0 0 2007 45–23 66.2% #25 1,870 0 4
26 2010 22–22 50.0% #49 1,807 0 0 2008 29–25 53.7% #31 1,746 0 4
27 2011 49–24 67.1% #9 2,006 0 2 2009 28–29 49.1% #33 1,748 0 4
28 2012 48–26 64.9% #9 1,972 0 3 2010 10–19 34.5% #97 1,731 0 4
29 2013 19–22 46.3% #36 1,778 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — 2012 14–17 45.2% #58 1,822 0 4
31 2015 3–7 30.0% #410 1,693 0 4 2013 6–19 24.0% #129 1,720 0 4
32 2016 7–10 41.2% #144 1,748 0 4 2014 11–17 39.3% #96 1,759 0 4
33 2017 5–12 29.4% #105 1,666 0 4 2015 7–12 36.8% #95 1,761 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 18–20 47.4% #73 1,679 0 4
35 2019 7–11 38.9% #219 1,665 0 4 2017 1–9 10.0% #249 1,574 0 4