H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 1-2
Robby Ginepri holds a 2–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Robby Ginepri leads 2–0 on grass, while Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2009 Moscow quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2009* | Moscow | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-3 6-3 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2008 | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2006* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Robby Ginepri | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Robby Ginepri | 4-6 7-5 6-3 6-3 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |