H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 0-2
Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 2–0 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2010 S Hertogenbosch final 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2010* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-0 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2008* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Janko Tipsarevic | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |