Janko Tipsarevic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gilles Simon | 2 | 9 | 11 | Jun 29, 2016 | H2H |
| Marin Cilic | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jun 16, 2017 | H2H |
| Sam Querrey | 4 | 4 | 8 | Apr 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Mikhail Youzhny | 3 | 5 | 8 | Sep 22, 2016 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 11, 2012 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Takao Suzuki
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Janko Tipsarevic vs Takao Suzuki.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Takao Suzuki | 7-6(11) 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data | Jun 24, 2003* | Q2 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,069 | 248 | 243 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Takao Suzuki | #1,016 | #102 | 470 | 1,669 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Takao Suzuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #262 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #225 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #205 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,008 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 50–27 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,970 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #36 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #471 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,687 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #509 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,664 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Takao Suzuki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 2003 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1998 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1999 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2000 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 16 | 15 | 31 | 51.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 38 | 17 | 55 | 69.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 29 | 18 | 47 | 61.7% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 159 | 142 | 301 | 52.8% | 49 | 61 | 110 | 44.5% | 38 | 34 | 72 | 52.8% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | 22 | 29 | 51 | 43.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 484/491 of Janko Tipsarevic's and 24/24 of Takao Suzuki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Takao Suzuki | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2003 | 3/3 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 54.3% | 69.5% | 55.6% | 43.6% | 40.6% | 62.7% | 34.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 9/9 | 7.7 | 3.3 | 58.4% | 71.0% | 46.0% | 53.8% | 30.4% | 60.8% | 36.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 22/22 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 51.9% | 70.6% | 51.3% | 48.7% | 34.1% | 61.3% | 34.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 25/25 | 7.1 | 2.2 | 57.1% | 75.0% | 49.3% | 50.8% | 34.2% | 64.0% | 34.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 38/38 | 8.0 | 2.7 | 55.2% | 74.6% | 47.1% | 56.6% | 43.5% | 61.6% | 32.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 44/47 | 9.3 | 2.6 | 55.9% | 75.1% | 51.7% | 52.5% | 43.7% | 64.8% | 34.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 49/49 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 55.7% | 73.8% | 51.7% | 57.1% | 44.2% | 63.9% | 36.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 44/44 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 57.3% | 72.7% | 54.1% | 60.0% | 41.3% | 64.7% | 36.3% | 2003 | 7/7 | 7.7 | 3.1 | 58.1% | 73.1% | 52.8% | 74.9% | 39.7% | 65.0% | 34.3% |
| 27 | 2011 | 72/73 | 6.1 | 2.3 | 56.0% | 76.7% | 56.2% | 61.0% | 49.2% | 67.6% | 40.8% | 2004 | 5/5 | 11.8 | 3.8 | 62.6% | 75.8% | 48.5% | 49.7% | 52.6% | 65.6% | 32.4% |
| 28 | 2012 | 74/77 | 7.8 | 2.5 | 56.9% | 75.3% | 53.7% | 60.1% | 42.7% | 66.0% | 37.6% | 2005 | 3/3 | 10.3 | 2.7 | 64.5% | 73.2% | 58.4% | 82.3% | 63.9% | 67.6% | 29.6% |
| 29 | 2013 | 42/42 | 6.2 | 2.2 | 57.9% | 71.8% | 51.9% | 64.7% | 38.7% | 63.3% | 34.9% | 2006 | 4/4 | 12.8 | 2.5 | 62.7% | 80.9% | 66.7% | 87.5% | 50.0% | 75.5% | 29.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1/1 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 54.3% | 76.5% | 60.5% | 50.0% | 14.3% | 69.1% | 32.4% |
| 31 | 2015 | 10/10 | 6.7 | 3.4 | 53.8% | 71.1% | 48.1% | 54.1% | 30.7% | 60.5% | 34.7% | 2008 | 3/3 | 12.0 | 2.3 | 60.0% | 77.6% | 50.9% | 68.4% | 44.4% | 66.4% | 33.0% |
| 32 | 2016 | 17/17 | 5.5 | 3.4 | 55.1% | 74.4% | 49.6% | 60.7% | 42.0% | 63.5% | 33.5% | 2009 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 60.9% | 57.1% | 72.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 63.0% | 26.7% |
| 33 | 2017 | 17/17 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 54.1% | 70.6% | 46.5% | 48.8% | 38.7% | 59.6% | 33.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 18/18 | 5.3 | 2.8 | 58.7% | 69.7% | 48.4% | 58.0% | 39.6% | 60.8% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 484/491 | 6.9 | 2.5 | 56.2% | 73.9% | 51.9% | 57.6% | 41.9% | 64.1% | 36.3% | — | 24/57 | 10.3 | 3.0 | 60.8% | 75.0% | 55.8% | 67.7% | 45.0% | 67.5% | 31.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Takao Suzuki | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1473 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1565 | 113.0 | -0.22 | +0.55 | 0.924 | 48.2% | +9 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.28 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.28 | 1996 | 1493 | 109.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | -0.16 |
| 20 | 2004 | 1554 | 115.3 | -1.04 | -1.30 | 0.929 | 48.4% | -23 | — | — | 30.8% | -0.69 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.51 | 1997 | 1507 | 105.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 21 | 2005 | 1545 | 121.5 | -1.24 | -1.36 | 0.900 | 48.0% | -6 | +49 | +94 | 35.0% | -0.75 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–7 (36%) | 97.8 | +0.44 | 1998 | 1545 | 118.3 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 44.4% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.29 |
| 22 | 2006 | 1557 | 119.7 | +1.24 | -1.88 | 0.947 | 48.5% | +8 | -55 | +107 | 38.2% | -0.88 | 4–6 (40%) | 7–5 (58%) | 100.9 | -0.13 | 1999 | 1462 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.20 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–6 (14%) | 91.0 | -0.13 |
| 23 | 2007 | 1735 | 133.6 | -0.76 | -2.94 | 0.836 | 46.9% | -60 | -192 | +8 | 46.9% | -0.29 | 8–5 (62%) | 7–9 (44%) | 105.4 | -1.63 | 2000 | 1477 | 103.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.83 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.17 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1734 | 143.1 | +1.16 | -1.11 | 0.978 | 49.7% | -22 | -145 | +100 | 55.6% | +0.19 | 11–7 (61%) | 17–14 (55%) | 108.6 | +1.14 | 2001 | 1517 | 105.7 | — | — | — | — | +20 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.21 | 2–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.26 |
| 25 | 2009 | 1822 | 147.5 | +0.76 | +0.05 | 1.011 | 50.4% | -6 | -158 | +1 | 54.8% | +0.23 | 4–9 (31%) | 12–9 (57%) | 97.8 | -1.85 | 2002 | 1506 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.93 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.27 |
| 26 | 2010 | 1809 | 151.3 | +1.01 | +0.14 | 1.028 | 50.6% | +32 | — | -18 | 53.3% | +0.22 | 3–6 (33%) | 11–8 (58%) | 99.7 | +0.29 | 2003 | 1609 | 114.1 | -2.01 | -0.21 | 0.982 | 49.9% | -33 | — | — | 56.3% | -0.13 | — | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.23 |
| 27 | 2011 | 2008 | 161.8 | +4.65 | +3.68 | 1.259 | 53.8% | +27 | -302 | -174 | 67.9% | +1.30 | 9–9 (50%) | 17–15 (53%) | 99.0 | +2.83 | 2004 | 1611 | 113.5 | +1.14 | -2.01 | 0.942 | 49.1% | +12 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.86 | 1–1 | 4–2 (67%) | — | -0.08 |
| 28 | 2012 | 1971 | 166.2 | +3.35 | +1.51 | 1.105 | 51.6% | -5 | +2 | -70 | 63.4% | +0.64 | 13–10 (57%) | 22–12 (65%) | 109.2 | +3.81 | 2005 | 1588 | 114.1 | -0.19 | +2.68 | 0.913 | 49.3% | +55 | — | — | 44.4% | +0.22 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.25 |
| 29 | 2013 | 1768 | 146.7 | +0.25 | -1.48 | 0.952 | 49.4% | +60 | +92 | — | 45.7% | -0.06 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–13 (28%) | 96.2 | +2.99 | 2006 | 1619 | 124.5 | +2.96 | -0.08 | 1.193 | 53.1% | +51 | — | — | 63.6% | +1.28 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–3 (40%) | 102.8 | +0.05 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1544 | 100.8 | -3.25 | +0.61 | 1.049 | 50.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 31 | 2015 | 1688 | 112.4 | -1.37 | -1.80 | 0.879 | 47.3% | — | +95 | — | 33.3% | -1.15 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 97.9 | -0.32 | 2008 | 1543 | 102.7 | +1.12 | -0.43 | 0.981 | 50.2% | +54 | — | — | 62.5% | -0.13 | 1–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.15 |
| 32 | 2016 | 1748 | 142.6 | -0.09 | -0.68 | 0.919 | 48.7% | +53 | — | +20 | 42.9% | -0.19 | 2–1 (67%) | 4–8 (33%) | 99.1 | -0.57 | 2009 | 1541 | 112.1 | +2.43 | +1.00 | 0.722 | 42.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.10 |
| 33 | 2017 | 1664 | 126.4 | -2.04 | -2.13 | 0.837 | 47.1% | +89 | +27 | +28 | 35.9% | -0.77 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–6 (45%) | 98.6 | -0.12 | 2010 | 1546 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1528 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 1665 | 130.0 | -2.14 | +0.50 | 0.985 | 50.2% | +38 | +16 | +26 | 45.8% | -0.21 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–8 (27%) | 94.3 | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1512 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1508 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2069 | 152.5 | +1.24 | +0.04 | 1.011 | 50.2% | +11 | -51 | -1 | 52.0% | +0.13 | 70–71 (50%) | 118–120 (50%) | 101.9 | +1.46 | — | 1669 | 118.5 | +0.23 | -0.15 | 0.981 | 49.9% | +27 | — | — | 43.2% | -0.56 | 9–11 (45%) | 18–15 (55%) | 105.7 | +0.21 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Takao Suzuki
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paradorn Srichaphan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 5, 2006 | H2H |
| Roger Federer | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 7, 2006 | H2H |
| Alexander Waske | 2 | 0 | 2 | Oct 6, 2006 | H2H |
| Wayne Arthurs | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 5, 2005 | H2H |
| Jan-Michael Gambill | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jan 19, 2005 | H2H |