H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Janko Tipsarevic vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 1-2
Thomas Johansson holds a 2–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2008 Miami Masters third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2008* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-4 6-4 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
| Feb 1, 2007* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Thomas Johansson | 6-4 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Thomas Johansson | 6-2 6-3 6-1 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janko Tipsarevic | Thomas Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 |
| 32 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 |
| 33 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 |
| 35 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |