H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jannik Sinner vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 1-2
Aljaz Bedene holds a 2–1 lead over Jannik Sinner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2021 Montpellier third round 3-6 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2021* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Aljaz Bedene | 3-6 6-2 7-6(3) | Jannik Sinner | Match data |
| Feb 5, 2021* | Great Ocean Road Open | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2019* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Jannik Sinner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,413 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,001 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,031 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,197 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,360 | 2 | 18 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,381 | 4 | 24 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,395 | 5 | 30 | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |