H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Jannik Sinner vs Benjamin Bonzi H2H: 4-0
Jannik Sinner holds a 4–0 lead over Benjamin Bonzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jannik Sinner leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jannik Sinner won the 2026 Mutua Madrid Open second round 6-7(6) 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
France
Age 30
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | Mutua Madrid Open | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jannik Sinner | 6-7(6) 6-1 6-4 | Benjamin Bonzi | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2023* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Benjamin Bonzi | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2022* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | Benjamin Bonzi | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jannik Sinner | 6-2 6-4 6-4 | Benjamin Bonzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,413 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| Benjamin Bonzi | #102 | #42 | 1,089 | 1,808 | 65 | 82 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | Benjamin Bonzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,001 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,031 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,197 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #187 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,360 | 2 | 18 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,381 | 4 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,395 | 5 | 30 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #64 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #60 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #73 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #75 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |