H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC
Jannik Sinner holds a 2–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jannik Sinner leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jannik Sinner won the 2024 ABN AMRO Open first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | 6-3 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Feb 15, 2024* | R32 | ABN AMRO Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Jannik Sinner | 6-4 7-5 6-3 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Jan 16, 2024* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,419 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #41 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 127 | 126 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,931 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,033 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,223 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,374 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,389 | 4 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,401 | 5 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #41 | 1,864 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2019 | 1677 | 133.0 | -2.19 | +0.96 | 0.939 | 48.4% | -4 | -57 | — | 39.5% | -0.74 | 4–0 (100%) | 0–6 (0%) | 102.1 | +0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 1932 | 160.2 | +1.04 | +2.55 | 1.091 | 52.2% | -109 | -107 | — | 63.6% | +0.92 | 4–5 (44%) | 6–6 (50%) | 104.5 | -1.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 1992 | 163.5 | +2.37 | +3.80 | 1.157 | 52.6% | +7 | -57 | — | 62.5% | +0.72 | 10–7 (59%) | 21–14 (60%) | 106.4 | +0.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 2033 | 158.1 | +2.32 | +3.73 | 1.143 | 52.3% | -44 | +33 | -300 | 68.0% | +1.03 | 13–5 (72%) | 14–7 (67%) | 110.2 | +1.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 2224 | 174.4 | +5.31 | +5.60 | 1.336 | 54.7% | +62 | -189 | -298 | 72.4% | +1.54 | 18–7 (72%) | 17–13 (57%) | 106.7 | -0.21 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 2375 | 177.5 | +7.62 | +6.29 | 1.480 | 55.9% | +67 | -239 | -283 | 83.3% | +1.99 | 13–6 (68%) | 23–8 (74%) | 107.9 | -1.06 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 2389 | 177.6 | +7.82 | +8.64 | 1.583 | 57.2% | +79 | -187 | -202 | 87.3% | +2.49 | 4–3 (57%) | 16–3 (84%) | 104.8 | -1.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 2401 | 171.2 | +8.50 | +6.29 | 1.604 | 56.8% | +24 | -103 | -89 | 87.5% | +2.27 | 4–3 (57%) | 14–5 (74%) | 99.8 | -0.60 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | 108.1 | -0.41 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | 107.5 | -1.63 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | 103.7 | +0.41 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.0 | -2.47 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | 96.4 | -1.80 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1865 | 149.1 | -1.13 | +2.52 | 1.032 | 50.8% | +24 | -159 | -224 | 56.0% | +0.25 | 7–10 (41%) | 21–11 (66%) | 103.6 | -0.28 |
| Career | — | 2419 | 174.2 | +4.98 | +5.30 | 1.316 | 54.4% | +27 | -107 | -241 | 74.4% | +1.53 | 70–36 (66%) | 111–62 (64%) | 115.0 | -0.74 | — | 1933 | 149.2 | -0.95 | +1.98 | 1.003 | 50.0% | +6 | -67 | -106 | 49.2% | -0.06 | 41–40 (51%) | 67–54 (55%) | 106.5 | -2.44 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | 10 | 7 | 17 | May 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Carlos Alcaraz | 7 | 10 | 17 | Apr 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexander Zverev | 11 | 4 | 15 | Jul 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 6 | 5 | 11 | Jul 10, 2026 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 8 | 3 | 11 | May 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |