H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jannik Sinner vs Daniel Evans H2H: 1-0
Jannik Sinner holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Evans in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jannik Sinner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jannik Sinner won the 2023 Beijing third round 6-4 6-7(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2023* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,413 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | Daniel Evans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,001 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,031 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,197 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,360 | 2 | 18 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,381 | 4 | 24 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,395 | 5 | 30 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |