H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 16:33 UTC
Jannik Sinner vs James Duckworth H2H: 3-1
Jannik Sinner holds a 3–1 lead over James Duckworth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jannik Sinner leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jannik Sinner won the 2026 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 34
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 6-1 6-4 6-2 | James Duckworth | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2021* | Sofia | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 7-6(4) 6-4 | James Duckworth | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2021* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | James Duckworth | 6-3 6-4 | Jannik Sinner | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2020* | Cologne 2 | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 6-1 6-2 | James Duckworth | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,413 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| James Duckworth | #74 | #46 | 1,244 | 1,799 | 76 | 128 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | James Duckworth | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,001 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,031 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,197 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,360 | 2 | 18 | 2014 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #127 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,381 | 4 | 24 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,395 | 5 | 30 | 2016 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #155 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |