H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:17 UTC
Jannik Sinner vs Jan-Lennard Struff H2H: 4-0
Jannik Sinner holds a 4–0 lead over Jan-Lennard Struff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jannik Sinner leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jannik Sinner won the 2026 Wimbledon quarterfinal 7-5 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2026 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Jannik Sinner | 7-5 7-6(4) 6-3 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2024* | Halle | ATP 500 | QF | Grass | Jannik Sinner | 6-2 6-7(1) 7-6(3) | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2024* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Jannik Sinner | 6-4 6-2 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2024* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 6-3 6-4 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,413 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | Jan-Lennard Struff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,001 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,031 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,197 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,360 | 2 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,381 | 4 | 24 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,395 | 5 | 30 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 |