H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Jannik Sinner vs Nicolas Jarry H2H: 2-1
Jannik Sinner holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Jarry in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jannik Sinner leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Nicolas Jarry leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jannik Sinner won the 2025 Australian Open first round 7-6 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2025* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 7-6 7-6 6-1 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2024* | Beijing | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Nicolas Jarry | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2019* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Nicolas Jarry | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Jannik Sinner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,413 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | Nicolas Jarry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,001 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,031 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,197 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,360 | 2 | 18 | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,381 | 4 | 24 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,395 | 5 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |