H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 07:16 UTC
Jannik Sinner vs Roberto Carballes Baena H2H: 2-0
Jannik Sinner holds a 2–0 lead over Roberto Carballes Baena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jannik Sinner leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jannik Sinner won the 2022 Umag quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2022* | Umag | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jannik Sinner | 6-4 7-6(5) | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
| May 26, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jannik Sinner | 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-3 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,413 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | Roberto Carballes Baena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,001 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,031 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,197 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,360 | 2 | 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,381 | 4 | 24 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,395 | 5 | 30 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |