H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jannik Sinner vs Steve Johnson H2H: 3-0
Jannik Sinner holds a 3–0 lead over Steve Johnson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jannik Sinner leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jannik Sinner won the 2022 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 24
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 6-2 6-4 6-3 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2021* | Washington | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Jannik Sinner | 6-4 6-2 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
| May 14, 2019* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jannik Sinner | 1-6 6-1 7-5 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jannik Sinner | #1 | #1 | 14,750 | 2,413 | 351 | 92 | 79.2% | 5 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 30 |
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jannik Sinner | Steve Johnson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #37 | 1,939 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #10 | 2,001 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #15 | 2,031 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,197 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 71–7 | 91.0% | #1 | 2,360 | 2 | 18 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,381 | 4 | 24 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 44–3 | 93.6% | #1 | 2,395 | 5 | 30 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |