H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jared Palmer vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 0-1

Gilad Bloom holds a 1–0 lead over Jared Palmer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gilad Bloom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilad Bloom won the 1990 Washington Open round of 32 6-2 6-4.

USA Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gilad Bloom #71 6-2 6-4 Jared Palmer #266 Match data Jul 19, 1990* R32 Washington Open ATP Championship Series modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jared Palmer #1,385 #35 908 1,793 69 80 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,749 83 105 44.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jared Palmer Gilad Bloom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 1–2 33.3% #517 1,510 0 0
17 1989 3–2 60.0% #240 1,575 0 0 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0
18 1990 1–2 33.3% #564 1,567 0 0 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0
19 1991 1–3 25.0% #427 1,521 0 0 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0
20 1992 2–4 33.3% #149 1,536 0 0 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,546 0 0
21 1993 9–14 39.1% #105 1,605 0 0 1988 6–12 33.3% #210 1,550 0 0
22 1994 28–20 58.3% #36 1,790 0 1 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,569 0 0
23 1995 17–20 45.9% #125 1,717 0 1 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,736 0 0
24 1996 4–7 36.4% #214 1,651 0 1 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,635 0 0
25 1992 14–15 48.3% #137 1,662 0 0
26 1998 0–3 0.0% #174 1,598 0 1 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,634 0 0
27 1999 1–1 50.0% #435 1,611 0 1 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,623 0 0
28 2000 2–2 50.0% #357 1,621 0 1 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,612 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jared Palmer Gilad Bloom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1989 3 2 5 60.0% 1984 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1993 2 7 9 22.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1994 14 13 27 51.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1995 10 10 20 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 17 14 31 54.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 14 16 30 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2000 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 37 43 80 46.2% 19 18 37 51.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 55 60 115 47.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 9 12 21 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jared Palmer Gilad Bloom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1511 103.7 36.4% -0.45 1–1 +0.08
17 1989 1575 120.0 +29 61.5% +0.23 0–1 2–1 (67%) -0.46 1984 1504 101.0 50.0% -0.25 +0.36
18 1990 1568 102.3 +32 28.6% -1.57 1–0 0–1 +0.10 1985 1506 101.0 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 +0.41
19 1991 1522 96.9 36.4% -1.09 0–1 1–1 +0.70 1986 1539 115.3 +41 62.5% +1.25 1–1 +0.23
20 1992 1537 116.7 +37 44.4% -0.44 0–2 +0.01 1987 1546 112.7 +44 -44 0 40.5% -0.92 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) +2.10
21 1993 1606 122.8 -14 -61 -33 47.5% -0.26 0–8 (0%) 9–6 (60%) +0.34 1988 1550 124.8 +10 -16 41.2% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) -0.23
22 1994 1790 143.7 -57 -106 55.1% +0.46 8–7 (53%) 11–12 (48%) -1.51 1989 1570 117.7 +29 40.7% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 0–1 +0.89
23 1995 1717 129.7 -40 -20 -96 47.1% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 11–9 (55%) -0.01 1990 1736 132.7 +3 -224 -113 50.0% -0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–5 (55%) -0.07
24 1996 1652 119.0 -27 +6 44.1% -0.03 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) +0.12 1991 1635 129.6 -1.33 -0.10 0.947 48.9% +36 -169 -26 43.3% -0.34 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) -1.07
25 1992 1662 122.5 -2.20 -0.46 0.933 48.8% +11 -173 -51 48.7% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–5 (55%) +0.91
26 1998 1598 96.8 14.3% -2.57 0–1 +0.19 1993 1635 107.0 +0.30 +0.70 0.994 50.2% +14 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) +0.15
27 1999 1612 106.7 40.0% -0.80 1–0 0–1 -0.30 1994 1623 114.8 +0.78 +0.24 0.963 48.9% -113 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 -0.05
28 2000 1621 116.8 +49 50.0% +0.70 1–1 0–1 -0.46 1995 1613 102.1 +0.57 -1.46 0.745 43.3% 0.0% -3.00 -0.11
Career 1794 135.2 -28 -66 -49 48.1% -0.12 19–31 (38%) 35–37 (49%) 97.4 -0.81 1749 130.0 -1.37 -0.17 0.942 48.9% +21 -113 -54 45.0% -0.33 31–36 (46%) 23–32 (42%) 99.0 +1.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.