H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jared Palmer vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 1-0
Jared Palmer holds a 1–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jared Palmer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jared Palmer won the 1995 US Open first round 6-4 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jared Palmer | 6-4 7-5 6-3 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Palmer | #1,385 | #35 | 908 | 1,812 | 69 | 80 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jared Palmer | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #517 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #240 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #564 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #427 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #105 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #125 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #214 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #435 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2000 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #357 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |