H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jared Palmer vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 1-2
Mark Woodforde holds a 2–1 lead over Jared Palmer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jared Palmer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1994 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1994* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | Jared Palmer | Match data |
| May 7, 1994* | Pinehurst | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jared Palmer | 6-3 6-4 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1994* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-3 | Jared Palmer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jared Palmer | #1,385 | #35 | 908 | 1,812 | 69 | 80 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jared Palmer | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #517 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #240 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #564 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #427 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #105 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #125 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1996 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #214 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #435 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2000 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #357 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |