H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Andrey Golubev H2H: 1-0
Jarkko Nieminen holds a 1–0 lead over Andrey Golubev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarkko Nieminen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2015 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-2 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-1 6-2 7-6(6) | Andrey Golubev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andrey Golubev | #1,694 | #33 | 1,210 | 1,781 | 51 | 107 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Andrey Golubev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #147 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #74 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #206 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |