H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Andy Roddick H2H: 0-2
Andy Roddick holds a 2–0 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Roddick won the 2010 Paris Masters third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2010* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 6-1 6-4 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| May 26, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Andy Roddick | 6-2 4-6 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Andy Roddick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |