H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Antony Dupuis H2H: 1-1
Jarkko Nieminen and Antony Dupuis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 1–0 on carpet, while Antony Dupuis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2003 Milan fourth round 7-6(4) 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2003* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jarkko Nieminen | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | Antony Dupuis | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2002* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Antony Dupuis | 2-6 7-6(7) 6-1 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Antony Dupuis | #1,333 | #57 | 661 | 1,686 | 86 | 128 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Antony Dupuis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #319 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #103 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #90 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #70 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #78 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #297 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |