H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 6-3

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 6–3 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 6–2 on hard courts, while Benjamin Becker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2014 Tokyo third round 7-5 4-1 RET.

FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6 3
9 main draw meetings
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 2, 2014* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Benjamin Becker #62 7-5 4-1 (ret.) Jarkko Nieminen #50 Match data
Aug 20, 2014* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #54 7-5 6-4 Benjamin Becker #58 Match data
Oct 17, 2013* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #41 6-3 3-6 7-6(3) Benjamin Becker #71 Match data
Aug 22, 2012* Winston-Salem ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #42 6-3 6-3 Benjamin Becker #90 Match data
Oct 2, 2010* Bangkok ATP 250 SF Hard Jarkko Nieminen #60 6-3 6-2 Benjamin Becker #65 Match data
Sep 23, 2010* Metz ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #62 6-3 7-6(2) Benjamin Becker #65 Match data
Jun 16, 2010* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Benjamin Becker #48 6-4 3-6 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #64 Match data
Feb 27, 2010* Delray Beach ATP 250 QF Hard Jarkko Nieminen #109 7-5 3-6 7-6(5) Benjamin Becker #40 Match data
Oct 7, 2006* Tokyo ATP 250 QF Hard Benjamin Becker #72 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,851 153 215 41.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Benjamin Becker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,725 0 0
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,642 0 0
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,811 0 1
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,724 0 1
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,725 0 1
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2013 9–19 32.1% #79 1,767 0 1
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2014 27–25 51.9% #40 1,835 0 1
34 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,732 0 1
35 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,734 0 1
36 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,591 0 1