H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Benjamin Becker H2H: 6-3

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 6–3 lead over Benjamin Becker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 6–2 on hard courts, while Benjamin Becker leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Benjamin Becker won the 2014 Japan Open first round 7-5 4-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 45 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6 – 3
9 main draw meetings
Benjamin Becker
GER Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Benjamin Becker #62 7-5 4-1 (ret.) Jarkko Nieminen #50 Match data Oct 2, 2014* R32 Japan Open ATP 500 Hard
Jarkko Nieminen #54 7-5 6-4 Benjamin Becker #58 Match data Aug 20, 2014* R32 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Jarkko Nieminen #41 6-3 3-6 7-6(3) Benjamin Becker #71 Match data Oct 17, 2013* R32 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Jarkko Nieminen #42 6-3 6-3 Benjamin Becker #90 Match data Aug 22, 2012* R32 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Jarkko Nieminen #60 6-3 6-2 Benjamin Becker #65 Match data Oct 2, 2010* SF Bangkok ATP 250 Hard
Jarkko Nieminen #62 6-3 7-6(2) Benjamin Becker #65 Match data Sep 23, 2010* R32 Metz ATP 250 Hard
Benjamin Becker #48 6-4 3-6 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #64 Match data Jun 16, 2010* R32 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass
Jarkko Nieminen #109 7-5 3-6 7-6(5) Benjamin Becker #40 Match data Feb 27, 2010* QF Delray Beach Open ATP 250 Hard
Benjamin Becker #72 6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #16 Match data Oct 7, 2006* QF Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,920 363 339 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Benjamin Becker #1,074 #35 1,098 1,848 153 217 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Benjamin Becker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 18–17 51.4% #77 1,692 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,795 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,790 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,815 0 1 2006 9–8 52.9% #58 1,726 0 0
26 2008 24–27 47.1% #37 1,751 0 1 2007 21–30 41.2% #84 1,586 0 0
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,679 0 1 2008 11–20 35.5% #129 1,640 0 0
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,880 0 1 2009 14–19 42.4% #40 1,643 0 1
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,832 0 1 2010 30–29 50.8% #53 1,808 0 1
30 2012 24–27 47.1% #41 1,752 0 2 2011 3–9 25.0% #304 1,723 0 1
31 2013 31–27 53.4% #39 1,794 0 2 2012 10–14 41.7% #65 1,724 0 1
32 2014 23–26 46.9% #73 1,764 0 2 2013 9–20 31.0% #79 1,761 0 1
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,691 0 2 2014 27–26 50.9% #40 1,831 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2015 10–21 32.3% #97 1,734 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2016 9–18 33.3% #119 1,735 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–3 0.0% #519 1,602 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Benjamin Becker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 15 15 30 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 28 14 42 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 20 17 37 54.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2006 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 17 18 35 48.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 14 18 32 43.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 9 13 22 40.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
28 2010 22 16 38 57.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
29 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 20 21 41 48.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
30 2012 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2011 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 21 18 39 53.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2014 14 15 29 48.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 6 16 22 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
33 2015 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 20 18 38 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 8 14 22 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 231 209 440 52.5% 98 87 185 53.0% 25 32 57 43.9% 9 11 20 45.0% — 105 151 256 41.0% 11 34 45 24.4% 36 30 66 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 681/701 of Jarkko Nieminen's and 368/370 of Benjamin Becker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Benjamin Becker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2001 3/5 7.0 3.7 64.8% 67.0% 52.6% 38.3% 58.7% 62.1% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 44/51 2.5 2.9 62.7% 65.7% 51.6% 53.5% 45.5% 60.3% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 65/66 3.1 1.7 68.1% 66.3% 52.3% 58.9% 43.1% 61.2% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 32/35 2.8 2.8 63.1% 67.8% 49.7% 56.3% 43.9% 60.9% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 51/51 2.3 1.9 65.9% 65.2% 50.8% 61.7% 47.0% 60.4% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 76/76 3.8 1.8 62.5% 70.2% 52.6% 62.4% 50.8% 63.5% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 57/57 3.1 1.8 65.7% 69.8% 51.0% 55.5% 42.4% 63.2% 40.4% 2006 17/17 12.8 3.5 54.7% 80.0% 53.5% 61.7% 33.8% 68.4% 33.2%
26 2008 50/51 3.0 2.1 67.1% 65.8% 49.5% 55.0% 45.4% 60.6% 37.8% 2007 51/51 8.2 3.1 51.8% 76.3% 52.1% 66.5% 30.1% 64.5% 32.2%
27 2009 23/25 2.9 2.0 63.4% 66.4% 51.4% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 37.7% 2008 31/31 8.9 3.0 52.6% 75.0% 50.0% 60.3% 41.1% 63.2% 33.3%
28 2010 54/55 4.0 2.1 70.2% 70.2% 51.8% 60.6% 40.5% 64.5% 36.9% 2009 33/33 9.0 2.2 57.5% 76.2% 51.3% 47.2% 48.7% 65.7% 32.1%
29 2011 45/45 3.1 2.3 63.3% 66.7% 52.7% 51.6% 46.2% 61.2% 35.8% 2010 58/59 7.9 2.7 57.9% 76.7% 51.0% 57.2% 40.4% 65.9% 36.0%
30 2012 49/51 2.9 2.0 68.0% 67.4% 48.1% 52.4% 43.1% 61.1% 37.0% 2011 12/12 7.3 2.8 54.1% 78.4% 52.0% 55.5% 37.3% 66.1% 30.9%
31 2013 57/58 3.3 2.2 65.6% 67.4% 51.6% 58.1% 45.4% 62.0% 38.3% 2012 24/24 7.3 3.0 54.3% 70.9% 49.7% 50.5% 38.3% 61.3% 34.8%
32 2014 49/49 3.2 2.6 64.8% 69.0% 50.1% 54.1% 43.3% 62.5% 37.1% 2013 29/29 7.3 3.1 57.0% 73.6% 48.0% 52.8% 39.6% 62.5% 32.0%
33 2015 26/26 3.5 2.0 64.8% 67.0% 47.0% 58.4% 48.9% 59.9% 35.0% 2014 53/53 6.2 2.9 58.4% 74.0% 50.0% 59.1% 37.3% 63.9% 35.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 30/31 7.0 3.2 60.6% 70.9% 48.5% 57.4% 42.2% 62.0% 31.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 27/27 5.3 2.8 61.2% 69.9% 44.2% 45.4% 31.3% 60.1% 34.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 3/3 5.3 4.7 58.2% 70.8% 41.4% 33.3% 34.3% 58.8% 35.0%
Career — 681/702 3.2 2.1 65.5% 67.7% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 61.8% 38.4% — 368/370 7.7 2.9 56.5% 74.6% 50.0% 56.5% 38.1% 63.9% 33.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Benjamin Becker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1495 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1608 123.2 +0.61 +1.71 1.100 52.3% +13 — — 76.9% +1.38 0–1 2–0 — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1703 142.5 -1.24 +1.57 0.997 50.1% -45 +40 -185 48.4% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1729 140.9 -0.12 +2.38 1.030 50.4% -35 +85 -165 51.1% +0.21 18–10 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — -1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1693 138.9 -1.64 +2.77 1.010 50.2% +2 +122 — 50.0% +0.06 6–2 (75%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1796 147.3 -1.48 +2.47 1.008 50.2% -4 +57 — 57.3% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 17–8 (68%) — -2.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1790 144.5 +1.14 +1.94 1.079 51.7% +1 +35 -85 63.0% +0.77 15–14 (52%) 25–15 (63%) — +3.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1815 149.2 +0.54 +3.30 1.098 51.4% +4 -52 -56 53.1% +0.26 9–10 (47%) 13–9 (59%) — +0.31 2006 1727 131.5 +4.00 -1.34 1.052 50.5% -16 — -89 52.2% +0.28 3–1 (75%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.39
26 2008 1751 142.7 -1.76 +1.34 0.960 49.4% +12 +26 -24 48.5% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 10–10 (50%) — +1.39 2007 1586 123.7 -0.11 -2.84 0.906 48.3% +35 -110 +5 43.0% -0.55 5–7 (42%) 14–12 (54%) — +1.96
27 2009 1680 134.6 -1.97 +1.08 0.969 49.3% +9 — — 48.1% -0.20 1–7 (13%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.07 2008 1641 125.7 +0.57 -2.80 0.905 48.2% +40 -198 -53 36.5% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 3–13 (19%) — +0.69
28 2010 1880 148.3 +0.94 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +5 -146 -149 51.4% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.24 2009 1644 132.3 +1.65 -2.97 0.936 49.1% -43 — +148 43.6% -0.31 4–5 (44%) 5–11 (31%) — +0.84
29 2011 1832 150.6 -0.65 -0.67 0.921 48.7% +2 -26 -186 46.0% -0.27 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) — -2.73 2010 1809 142.6 +2.02 -0.41 1.058 50.6% -11 -338 +42 48.5% +0.02 6–7 (46%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.59
30 2012 1752 149.6 -1.35 +0.73 0.950 49.5% +56 +12 -102 44.2% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.02 2011 1724 129.0 +0.80 -3.08 0.912 48.3% -14 — — 31.0% -0.62 1–1 2–7 (22%) — -0.87
31 2013 1795 155.2 -1.06 +2.01 1.008 50.4% +6 +18 -185 51.0% +0.23 14–10 (58%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.63 2012 1724 136.6 -1.52 -0.33 0.901 48.3% -1 — +165 41.1% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — 0.00
32 2014 1765 141.8 -1.21 +0.74 0.990 49.9% -22 -29 -99 47.4% -0.17 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) — -0.46 2013 1761 143.4 -0.06 -2.70 0.853 47.4% -12 — +158 35.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 7–11 (39%) — -2.02
33 2015 1692 136.3 -2.79 -0.68 0.873 47.9% +14 -6 +35 39.1% -0.68 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.18 2014 1832 144.8 -0.11 -0.42 0.980 49.7% -14 -338 +56 47.2% -0.16 9–6 (60%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.66
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1734 136.6 -2.43 -2.38 0.837 47.2% -2 -183 — 38.8% -0.93 5–9 (36%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1735 129.7 -2.90 -1.85 0.853 47.0% +10 -190 +45 36.4% -0.88 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.04
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1602 105.6 -0.43 -2.63 0.850 46.6% — — — 0.0% -2.17 — 0–1 — +0.26
Career — 1921 151.5 -0.65 +1.56 1.005 50.2% 0 +14 -108 51.2% +0.11 126–118 (52%) 157–133 (54%) 102.3 -0.51 — 1849 140.2 +0.18 -1.77 0.932 48.8% -2 -223 +64 42.1% -0.45 46–54 (46%) 69–102 (40%) 92.8 +0.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.