H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Bjorn Phau H2H: 3-0

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 3–0 lead over Bjorn Phau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2013 Sydney third round 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Bjorn Phau
GER Age 46 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 10, 2013* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #44 6-0 6-1 Bjorn Phau #78 Match data
Sep 2, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #57 6-2 6-4 5-7 6-4 Bjorn Phau #108 Match data
Sep 30, 2004* Shanghai ATP 250 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #71 3-6 6-3 6-4 Bjorn Phau #200 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Bjorn Phau #1,098 #59 1,038 1,733 80 138 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Bjorn Phau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #438 1,488 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 1999 3–2 60.0% #323 1,540 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2000 0–4 0.0% #208 1,520 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2001 2–4 33.3% #183 1,579 0 0
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2002 1–6 14.3% #148 1,503 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2003 1–4 20.0% #158 1,519 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2004 5–4 55.6% #136 1,549 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2005 10–14 41.7% #87 1,636 0 0
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2006 16–26 38.1% #77 1,533 0 0
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2007 4–10 28.6% #183 1,562 0 0
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2008 3–4 42.9% #120 1,663 0 0
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2009 12–17 41.4% #111 1,655 0 0
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2010 9–13 40.9% #102 1,620 0 0
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2011 2–7 22.2% #156 1,609 0 0
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2012 7–14 33.3% #75 1,656 0 0
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2013 2–6 25.0% #316 1,641 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2014 3–2 60.0% #371 1,699 0 0