H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Bohdan Ulihrach H2H: 2-2
Jarkko Nieminen and Bohdan Ulihrach are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Bohdan Ulihrach leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2005 Munich third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2005* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jarkko Nieminen | 7-5 6-1 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2004* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bohdan Ulihrach | 6-3 7-6(5) | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2003* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-4 6-2 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| Jan 31, 2002* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Bohdan Ulihrach | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Bohdan Ulihrach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |