H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Carlos Moya H2H: 1-2
Carlos Moya holds a 2–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Carlos Moya leads 2–0 on clay, while Jarkko Nieminen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2005 Barcelona third round 7-5 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2005* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Carlos Moya | 7-5 5-7 6-2 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2004* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Carlos Moya | (w/o) | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Sep 27, 2003* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Carlos Moya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 |