H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 6-4
Jarkko Nieminen holds a 6–4 lead over Feliciano Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Feliciano Lopez leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2013 Shanghai Masters second round 7-6(2) 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
6
–
4
10 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2013* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6(2) 4-6 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Jun 19, 2013* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Feliciano Lopez | 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Jun 27, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jarkko Nieminen | 7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2012* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Feliciano Lopez | 6-3 6-1 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2009* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Feliciano Lopez | 6-2 6-1 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2009* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-2 7-6(9) | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2007* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 3-6 6-2 7-6(6) | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| May 30, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-2 6-4 7-6(2) | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2006* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-3 7-5 | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2003* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-3 1-1 (ret.) | Feliciano Lopez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Feliciano Lopez | #672 | #12 | 2,415 | 2,013 | 497 | 477 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Feliciano Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #159 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #62 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #28 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #30 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #47 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #20 | 1,968 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #40 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #14 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #17 | 1,943 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #28 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #64 | 1,817 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #62 | 1,824 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #64 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #106 | 1,595 | 0 | 7 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,468 | 0 | 7 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #468 | 1,517 | 0 | 7 |