H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-5

Fernando Verdasco holds a 5–3 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 5–2 on hard courts, while Jarkko Nieminen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2014 Stockholm fourth round 6-3 6-4.

FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 2014* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #36 6-3 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #57 Match data
Oct 18, 2013* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #32 6-2 3-6 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #41 Match data
Mar 10, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #57 6-1 6-0 Fernando Verdasco #29 Match data
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Fernando Verdasco #19 3-6 6-4 6-1 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #49 Match data
Feb 21, 2008* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Fernando Verdasco #30 6-2 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #27 Match data
Aug 23, 2007* New Haven ATP 250 R16 Hard Fernando Verdasco #35 6-3 2-6 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #26 Match data
Sep 7, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #57 6-2 7-6(6) 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #48 Match data
Jun 25, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jarkko Nieminen #32 6-7(8) 6-4 4-6 6-3 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #121 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7