H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Goran Ivanisevic H2H: 0-1
Goran Ivanisevic holds a 1–0 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Goran Ivanisevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Goran Ivanisevic won the 2002 Auckland third round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 54
Left-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2002* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Goran Ivanisevic | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Goran Ivanisevic | #395 | #2 | 3,572 | 2,124 | 561 | 316 | 64.0% | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Goran Ivanisevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #371 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #40 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,921 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 57–18 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,090 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #7 | 2,031 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 62–26 | 70.5% | #5 | 1,976 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,911 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 76–24 | 76.0% | #4 | 2,001 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #15 | 1,866 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 44–28 | 61.1% | #12 | 1,873 | 0 | 21 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,713 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #129 | 1,596 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #12 | 1,814 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #243 | 1,698 | 1 | 22 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #657 | 1,646 | 1 | 22 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #266 | 1,632 | 1 | 22 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |