H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Greg Rusedski H2H: 1-1
Jarkko Nieminen and Greg Rusedski are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 1–0 on grass, while Jarkko Nieminen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2006 New Haven third round 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 52
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2006* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Greg Rusedski | Match data |
| Jun 19, 2003* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Greg Rusedski | 6-4 6-4 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Greg Rusedski | #944 | #4 | 3,094 | 2,049 | 415 | 276 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Greg Rusedski | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–29 | 42.0% | #114 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #6 | 1,950 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #9 | 2,011 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,802 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,807 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #31 | 1,904 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #119 | 1,825 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #46 | 1,819 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,780 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #191 | 1,638 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |