H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 1-1
Jarkko Nieminen and Guillermo Garcia-Lopez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2010 Bangkok final 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2010* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2004* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 7-5 6-4 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |