H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-1
Jarkko Nieminen holds a 2–1 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jarkko Nieminen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters second round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2005* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-4 7-6(4) | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2002* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jarkko Nieminen | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |