H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 0-1

Ivo Karlovic holds a 1–0 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivo Karlovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2014 US Open first round 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 45 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivo Karlovic #30 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #54 Match data Aug 27, 2014* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,920 363 339 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,999 363 335 52.0% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Ivo Karlovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 18–17 51.4% #77 1,692 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,795 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,790 0 1 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,665 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,815 0 1 2004 18–25 41.9% #61 1,685 0 0
26 2008 24–27 47.1% #37 1,751 0 1 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,745 0 0
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,679 0 1 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,633 0 0
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,880 0 1 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,931 0 3
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,832 0 1 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,814 0 4
30 2012 24–27 47.1% #41 1,752 0 2 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,797 0 4
31 2013 31–27 53.4% #39 1,794 0 2 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,866 0 4
32 2014 23–26 46.9% #73 1,764 0 2 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,821 0 4
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,691 0 2 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,769 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,774 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2014 36–28 56.2% #27 1,856 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,917 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,972 0 8
38 — — — — — — — 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,771 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,645 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,675 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,620 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,625 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Ivo Karlovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 15 15 30 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 28 14 42 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2007 20 17 37 54.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2004 6 12 18 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2008 17 18 35 48.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 9 11 20 45.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 8 11 19 42.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2010 22 16 38 57.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 30 16 46 65.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 17 14 31 54.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2009 9 15 24 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
31 2013 21 18 39 53.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 14 7 21 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2014 14 15 29 48.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
33 2015 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 12 11 23 52.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 24 18 42 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 26 18 44 59.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 20 13 33 60.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 8 12 20 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 9 11 20 45.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 231 209 440 52.5% 98 87 185 53.0% 25 32 57 43.9% 9 11 20 45.0% — 229 213 442 51.8% 54 70 124 43.5% 74 44 118 62.7% 6 8 14 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 681/701 of Jarkko Nieminen's and 692/698 of Ivo Karlovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Ivo Karlovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2001 3/5 7.0 3.7 64.8% 67.0% 52.6% 38.3% 58.7% 62.1% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 44/51 2.5 2.9 62.7% 65.7% 51.6% 53.5% 45.5% 60.3% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 65/66 3.1 1.7 68.1% 66.3% 52.3% 58.9% 43.1% 61.2% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 32/35 2.8 2.8 63.1% 67.8% 49.7% 56.3% 43.9% 60.9% 39.4% 2001 1/1 16.0 2.0 76.6% 71.4% 46.7% 60.0% 50.0% 65.6% 32.4%
23 2005 51/51 2.3 1.9 65.9% 65.2% 50.8% 61.7% 47.0% 60.4% 39.9% 2002 2/3 15.0 8.5 53.7% 75.3% 40.4% 71.7% 75.0% 59.2% 28.6%
24 2006 76/76 3.8 1.8 62.5% 70.2% 52.6% 62.4% 50.8% 63.5% 39.4% 2003 16/16 17.6 6.3 61.1% 83.8% 53.3% 73.0% 28.3% 71.9% 29.0%
25 2007 57/57 3.1 1.8 65.7% 69.8% 51.0% 55.5% 42.4% 63.2% 40.4% 2004 40/43 21.1 5.4 61.9% 81.6% 52.8% 63.7% 25.9% 70.3% 26.8%
26 2008 50/51 3.0 2.1 67.1% 65.8% 49.5% 55.0% 45.4% 60.6% 37.8% 2005 39/39 18.7 4.4 63.3% 82.0% 51.5% 69.3% 31.9% 70.9% 25.5%
27 2009 23/25 2.9 2.0 63.4% 66.4% 51.4% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 37.7% 2006 34/34 18.3 3.1 65.0% 82.0% 50.3% 70.9% 34.6% 70.7% 28.1%
28 2010 54/55 4.0 2.1 70.2% 70.2% 51.8% 60.6% 40.5% 64.5% 36.9% 2007 64/66 20.6 1.9 68.7% 84.3% 54.5% 71.9% 34.1% 74.9% 29.5%
29 2011 45/45 3.1 2.3 63.3% 66.7% 52.7% 51.6% 46.2% 61.2% 35.8% 2008 54/54 17.8 1.8 66.2% 81.4% 53.2% 66.2% 31.8% 71.8% 30.1%
30 2012 49/51 2.9 2.0 68.0% 67.4% 48.1% 52.4% 43.1% 61.1% 37.0% 2009 43/43 20.7 2.3 66.4% 84.9% 54.8% 62.5% 39.2% 74.8% 29.1%
31 2013 57/58 3.3 2.2 65.6% 67.4% 51.6% 58.1% 45.4% 62.0% 38.3% 2010 25/25 18.9 2.1 64.2% 83.5% 51.8% 68.0% 27.1% 72.1% 30.3%
32 2014 49/49 3.2 2.6 64.8% 69.0% 50.1% 54.1% 43.3% 62.5% 37.1% 2011 36/36 17.6 2.7 66.4% 80.8% 49.8% 65.5% 37.0% 70.5% 28.4%
33 2015 26/26 3.5 2.0 64.8% 67.0% 47.0% 58.4% 48.9% 59.9% 35.0% 2012 30/30 16.9 2.9 64.7% 79.5% 52.3% 61.0% 31.2% 69.7% 30.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 28/28 17.3 3.4 64.1% 82.1% 55.1% 61.7% 28.7% 72.4% 27.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 64/64 18.5 2.8 66.3% 82.8% 54.0% 68.7% 34.9% 73.2% 27.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 63/63 23.0 3.6 66.4% 84.9% 57.0% 73.1% 33.3% 75.5% 29.0%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 54/54 20.9 5.2 63.8% 81.7% 56.4% 72.1% 35.7% 72.6% 26.9%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 35/35 20.8 5.1 65.1% 81.8% 56.2% 67.0% 29.2% 72.7% 25.9%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 27/27 23.5 5.9 65.1% 83.9% 54.4% 71.8% 28.8% 73.4% 25.9%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 26/26 23.7 4.3 65.0% 83.3% 54.3% 72.4% 24.8% 73.2% 25.6%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 13.4 3.6 66.8% 75.6% 56.8% 71.8% 21.3% 69.5% 24.7%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 6/6 18.2 5.2 64.8% 79.3% 46.0% 44.2% 29.2% 67.6% 27.1%
Career — 681/702 3.2 2.1 65.5% 67.7% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 61.8% 38.4% — 692/698 19.8 3.5 65.3% 82.6% 53.8% 68.2% 32.4% 72.6% 28.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Ivo Karlovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1495 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1608 123.2 +0.61 +1.71 1.100 52.3% +13 — — 76.9% +1.38 0–1 2–0 — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1703 142.5 -1.24 +1.57 0.997 50.1% -45 +40 -185 48.4% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1729 140.9 -0.12 +2.38 1.030 50.4% -35 +85 -165 51.1% +0.21 18–10 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — -1.19 2000 1493 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1693 138.9 -1.64 +2.77 1.010 50.2% +2 +122 — 50.0% +0.06 6–2 (75%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.07 2001 1501 100.2 -4.08 -1.53 0.943 47.8% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.14
23 2005 1796 147.3 -1.48 +2.47 1.008 50.2% -4 +57 — 57.3% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 17–8 (68%) — -2.46 2002 1455 101.0 -0.82 -1.26 0.701 45.7% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — -0.01
24 2006 1790 144.5 +1.14 +1.94 1.079 51.7% +1 +35 -85 63.0% +0.77 15–14 (52%) 25–15 (63%) — +3.02 2003 1666 123.8 +5.40 -4.66 1.033 50.5% -35 — +2 54.3% +0.22 2–2 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.07
25 2007 1815 149.2 +0.54 +3.30 1.098 51.4% +4 -52 -56 53.1% +0.26 9–10 (47%) 13–9 (59%) — +0.31 2004 1686 136.3 +5.37 -7.05 0.904 48.9% -54 -121 +84 45.1% -0.31 10–14 (42%) 28–28 (50%) — -0.85
26 2008 1751 142.7 -1.76 +1.34 0.960 49.4% +12 +26 -24 48.5% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 10–10 (50%) — +1.39 2005 1745 141.3 +6.26 -7.68 0.875 48.7% -20 -269 +91 45.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 24–22 (52%) — -2.07
27 2009 1680 134.6 -1.97 +1.08 0.969 49.3% +9 — — 48.1% -0.20 1–7 (13%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.07 2006 1633 131.3 +6.13 -7.11 0.960 49.6% +16 -48 — 51.1% +0.03 7–9 (44%) 19–18 (51%) — +0.32
28 2010 1880 148.3 +0.94 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +5 -146 -149 51.4% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.24 2007 1931 150.5 +9.95 -5.32 1.173 51.8% -6 -289 -103 60.5% +0.53 17–8 (68%) 37–30 (55%) — -1.29
29 2011 1832 150.6 -0.65 -0.67 0.921 48.7% +2 -26 -186 46.0% -0.27 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) — -2.73 2008 1815 150.1 +7.57 -4.88 1.069 50.7% +25 -181 +93 53.4% +0.24 7–10 (41%) 26–29 (47%) — +0.70
30 2012 1752 149.6 -1.35 +0.73 0.950 49.5% +56 +12 -102 44.2% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.02 2009 1798 147.0 +8.98 -4.91 1.158 51.5% -104 -119 +253 51.8% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 14–24 (37%) — 0.00
31 2013 1795 155.2 -1.06 +2.01 1.008 50.4% +6 +18 -185 51.0% +0.23 14–10 (58%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.63 2010 1867 147.8 +6.46 -3.55 1.087 51.1% -26 -171 — 56.7% +0.33 4–0 (100%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.09
32 2014 1765 141.8 -1.21 +0.74 0.990 49.9% -22 -29 -99 47.4% -0.17 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) — -0.46 2011 1822 147.5 +6.44 -5.95 0.962 49.6% +14 -88 +122 46.5% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 19–19 (50%) — -1.25
33 2015 1692 136.3 -2.79 -0.68 0.873 47.9% +14 -6 +35 39.1% -0.68 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.18 2012 1769 144.3 +5.38 -4.85 1.007 49.8% +37 -113 +182 48.7% -0.18 2–6 (25%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.59
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1774 137.0 +5.97 -5.23 1.007 50.0% +27 — +167 51.6% +0.06 6–4 (60%) 17–11 (61%) — +0.66
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1857 153.7 +7.97 -6.74 1.029 49.9% +21 -115 +54 55.0% +0.13 11–8 (58%) 34–31 (52%) — +1.55
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1917 155.1 +10.01 -5.54 1.186 51.7% -35 -231 +136 57.1% +0.52 15–12 (56%) 32–44 (42%) — +3.02
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1973 155.0 +7.27 -7.09 0.983 50.0% -18 -250 +83 56.8% +0.16 12–6 (67%) 41–25 (62%) — +3.08
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1771 141.4 +6.85 -7.48 0.952 49.6% +15 -53 +153 44.9% -0.17 6–5 (55%) 17–24 (41%) — +1.27
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1646 126.4 +5.95 -7.94 0.974 49.6% +41 +26 +201 46.2% -0.10 5–9 (36%) 17–24 (41%) — +0.79
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1675 134.3 +6.12 -7.61 0.954 49.4% +46 -25 +100 49.3% -0.17 2–6 (25%) 20–18 (53%) — +1.01
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1621 114.5 +1.55 -3.38 0.808 46.4% +33 — — 28.6% -1.00 — 1–4 (20%) — -0.32
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1626 114.4 +1.80 -4.17 0.837 47.4% +19 — — 31.3% -0.75 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.12
Career — 1921 151.5 -0.65 +1.56 1.005 50.2% 0 +14 -108 51.2% +0.11 126–118 (52%) 157–133 (54%) 102.3 -0.51 — 2000 150.3 +7.24 -6.06 1.023 50.2% -4 -133 +101 51.7% +0.09 123–122 (50%) 384–389 (50%) 100.0 +0.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.