H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 2-3

Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 3–2 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2007 Australian Open second round 6-3 2-6 6-4 6-4.

FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 46 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Juan Ignacio Chela #33 6-3 2-6 6-4 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #18 Match data
Jul 13, 2006* Bastad ATP 250 R32 Clay Jarkko Nieminen #13 6-4 5-7 6-1 Juan Ignacio Chela #45 Match data
Oct 10, 2003* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #30 6-2 6-7(10) 6-3 Juan Ignacio Chela #45 Match data
Apr 19, 2003* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #33 6-1 6-1 Jarkko Nieminen #38 Match data
Apr 24, 2002* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay Juan Ignacio Chela #25 6-4 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,909 306 268 53.3% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Juan Ignacio Chela
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2000 13–15 46.4% #63 1,540 0 1
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,594 0 1
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,783 0 2
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2004 33–25 56.9% #26 1,735 0 3
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,691 0 3
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,721 0 3
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,796 0 4
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,835 0 6
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,634 0 6
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2