H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Juan Monaco H2H: 3-3

Jarkko Nieminen and Juan Monaco are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Juan Monaco leads 3–0 on clay, while Jarkko Nieminen leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2015 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 6-1 7-6(4).

FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 20, 2015* Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 R16 Clay Juan Monaco #66 6-1 7-6(4) Jarkko Nieminen #77 Match data
Jul 31, 2014* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Juan Monaco #81 6-3 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #52 Match data
Oct 3, 2013* Tokyo ATP 500 R32 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #44 7-6(4) 6-1 Juan Monaco #36 Match data
Apr 13, 2010* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Juan Monaco #24 7-5 7-5 Jarkko Nieminen #68 Match data
Oct 30, 2007* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #26 6-4 6-4 Juan Monaco #20 Match data
Oct 6, 2006* Tokyo ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #16 6-2 6-3 Juan Monaco #75 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Juan Monaco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8