H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Karol Kucera H2H: 2-0
Jarkko Nieminen holds a 2–0 lead over Karol Kucera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2005 Bangkok third round 6-1 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-1 3-1 (ret.) | Karol Kucera | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2003* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 7-6(4) 6-0 | Karol Kucera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Karol Kucera | #1,540 | #6 | 2,732 | 1,994 | 259 | 230 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarkko Nieminen | Karol Kucera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #352 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #63 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 48–27 | 64.0% | #8 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #17 | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,764 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #101 | 1,721 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #83 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,764 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #91 | 1,674 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #310 | 1,669 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |