H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Kristof Vliegen H2H: 2-3

Kristof Vliegen holds a 3–2 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kristof Vliegen leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2010 Metz fourth round 6-4 6-1.

FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
BEL Age 44 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 24, 2010* Metz ATP 250 R16 Hard Jarkko Nieminen #62 6-4 6-1 Kristof Vliegen #307 Match data
Jun 14, 2007* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Jarkko Nieminen #22 6-3 6-1 Kristof Vliegen #56 Match data
Feb 22, 2007* Rotterdam ATP 500 R32 Hard Kristof Vliegen #43 6-1 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #18 Match data
May 6, 2006* Munich ATP 250 SF Clay Kristof Vliegen #50 6-1 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #20 Match data
Apr 19, 2006* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Kristof Vliegen #57 1-6 6-4 7-6(5) Jarkko Nieminen #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kristof Vliegen #452 #30 1,008 1,798 83 114 42.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Kristof Vliegen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2003 5–8 38.5% #116 1,503 0 0
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2004 9–14 39.1% #116 1,561 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2005 7–9 43.8% #93 1,595 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2006 31–22 58.5% #31 1,724 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2007 13–23 36.1% #98 1,629 0 0
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2008 7–16 30.4% #84 1,626 0 0
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2009 9–12 42.9% #110 1,696 0 0
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2010 2–10 16.7% #257 1,598 0 0
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2