H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 1-5

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 5–1 lead over Jarkko Nieminen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 3-6 6-3 4-6 6-0 11-9.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Lleyton Hewitt
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 1, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jarkko Nieminen #92 3-6 6-3 4-6 6-0 11-9 Lleyton Hewitt #118 Match data
Oct 19, 2012* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #102 7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #39 Match data
Jun 3, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Lleyton Hewitt #16 1-6 6-3 7-5 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #23 Match data
Sep 9, 2005* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Lleyton Hewitt #4 2-6 6-1 3-6 6-3 6-1 Jarkko Nieminen #57 Match data
Oct 31, 2002* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Lleyton Hewitt #1 6-2 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #42 Match data
Aug 10, 2002* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #1 2-6 6-2 6-3 Jarkko Nieminen #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 — — — — — — — 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 — — — — — — — 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30