H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jarkko Nieminen vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 2-1
Jarkko Nieminen holds a 2–1 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2013 US Open first round 7-5 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 7-5 7-5 6-2 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2012* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Lukasz Kubot | 6-4 6-4 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2012* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-3 5-7 7-6(2) | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jarkko Nieminen | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |