H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 2-1

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 2–1 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2013 US Open first round 7-5 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarkko Nieminen
FIN Age 45 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Lukasz Kubot
POL Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarkko Nieminen #41 7-5 7-5 6-2 Lukasz Kubot #71 Match data Aug 28, 2013* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lukasz Kubot #50 6-4 6-4 Jarkko Nieminen #45 Match data Jun 14, 2012* R32 Halle Open ATP 250 Grass
Jarkko Nieminen #46 6-3 5-7 7-6(2) Lukasz Kubot #58 Match data Feb 17, 2012* R16 ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,920 363 339 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Lukasz Kubot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 18–17 51.4% #77 1,692 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,795 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,790 0 1 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,815 0 1 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,485 0 0
26 2008 24–27 47.1% #37 1,751 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,679 0 1 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,880 0 1 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,653 0 0
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,832 0 1 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0
30 2012 24–27 47.1% #41 1,752 0 2 2012 21–27 43.8% #74 1,716 0 0
31 2013 31–27 53.4% #39 1,794 0 2 2013 10–17 37.0% #72 1,667 0 0
32 2014 23–26 46.9% #73 1,764 0 2 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,670 0 0
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,691 0 2 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,698 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Lukasz Kubot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 10 14 24 41.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 15 15 30 50.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 28 14 42 66.7% 12 8 20 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2007 20 17 37 54.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2008 17 18 35 48.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 22 16 38 57.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2011 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2012 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
31 2013 21 18 39 53.8% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2014 14 15 29 48.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 2015 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 231 209 440 52.5% 98 87 185 53.0% 25 32 57 43.9% 9 11 20 45.0% — 33 62 95 34.7% 36 45 81 44.4% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 681/701 of Jarkko Nieminen's and 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Lukasz Kubot
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2001 3/5 7.0 3.7 64.8% 67.0% 52.6% 38.3% 58.7% 62.1% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 44/51 2.5 2.9 62.7% 65.7% 51.6% 53.5% 45.5% 60.3% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 65/66 3.1 1.7 68.1% 66.3% 52.3% 58.9% 43.1% 61.2% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 32/35 2.8 2.8 63.1% 67.8% 49.7% 56.3% 43.9% 60.9% 39.4% 2004 2/2 1.5 3.0 62.7% 73.6% 41.1% 52.8% 16.7% 61.9% 40.0%
23 2005 51/51 2.3 1.9 65.9% 65.2% 50.8% 61.7% 47.0% 60.4% 39.9% 2005 1/1 0.0 1.0 83.0% 47.7% 55.6% 20.0% 0.0% 49.1% 27.5%
24 2006 76/76 3.8 1.8 62.5% 70.2% 52.6% 62.4% 50.8% 63.5% 39.4% 2006 10/10 3.3 4.3 61.6% 62.6% 44.2% 52.3% 33.1% 55.4% 33.8%
25 2007 57/57 3.1 1.8 65.7% 69.8% 51.0% 55.5% 42.4% 63.2% 40.4% 2007 3/3 2.7 2.0 60.8% 58.5% 40.6% 21.7% 46.8% 50.4% 41.3%
26 2008 50/51 3.0 2.1 67.1% 65.8% 49.5% 55.0% 45.4% 60.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 23/25 2.9 2.0 63.4% 66.4% 51.4% 57.2% 42.4% 61.1% 37.7% 2009 18/18 4.2 3.0 62.5% 70.6% 49.6% 57.5% 37.8% 63.0% 36.1%
28 2010 54/55 4.0 2.1 70.2% 70.2% 51.8% 60.6% 40.5% 64.5% 36.9% 2010 38/39 4.6 4.7 62.5% 66.5% 45.5% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 37.0%
29 2011 45/45 3.1 2.3 63.3% 66.7% 52.7% 51.6% 46.2% 61.2% 35.8% 2011 34/34 5.1 5.8 61.4% 70.1% 46.4% 56.6% 52.7% 60.9% 37.0%
30 2012 49/51 2.9 2.0 68.0% 67.4% 48.1% 52.4% 43.1% 61.1% 37.0% 2012 47/48 4.3 4.3 61.4% 69.3% 48.3% 58.0% 39.7% 61.2% 37.0%
31 2013 57/58 3.3 2.2 65.6% 67.4% 51.6% 58.1% 45.4% 62.0% 38.3% 2013 26/27 6.5 4.5 62.6% 67.8% 45.0% 52.0% 41.4% 59.2% 37.1%
32 2014 49/49 3.2 2.6 64.8% 69.0% 50.1% 54.1% 43.3% 62.5% 37.1% 2014 17/17 7.6 5.7 59.9% 69.1% 48.8% 57.0% 33.4% 60.8% 32.4%
33 2015 26/26 3.5 2.0 64.8% 67.0% 47.0% 58.4% 48.9% 59.9% 35.0% 2015 3/3 8.0 4.3 65.8% 68.0% 54.5% 69.4% 14.3% 63.4% 31.7%
Career — 681/702 3.2 2.1 65.5% 67.7% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 61.8% 38.4% — 199/202 5.0 4.6 61.9% 68.2% 46.9% 55.2% 41.9% 60.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Lukasz Kubot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1495 104.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1608 123.2 +0.61 +1.71 1.100 52.3% +13 — — 76.9% +1.38 0–1 2–0 — -0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1703 142.5 -1.24 +1.57 0.997 50.1% -45 +40 -185 48.4% -0.13 9–7 (56%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1729 140.9 -0.12 +2.38 1.030 50.4% -35 +85 -165 51.1% +0.21 18–10 (64%) 9–15 (38%) 102.3 -1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1693 138.9 -1.64 +2.77 1.010 50.2% +2 +122 — 50.0% +0.06 6–2 (75%) 6–8 (43%) 102.4 -0.07 2004 1514 104.6 +0.89 +0.01 1.051 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.09
23 2005 1796 147.3 -1.48 +2.47 1.008 50.2% -4 +57 — 57.3% +0.28 10–9 (53%) 17–8 (68%) 105.5 -2.46 2005 1484 98.6 +2.62 -3.59 0.539 38.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
24 2006 1790 144.5 +1.14 +1.94 1.079 51.7% +1 +35 -85 63.0% +0.77 15–14 (52%) 25–15 (63%) 102.1 +3.02 2006 1552 111.5 -2.84 -0.81 0.759 45.1% +43 — — 36.7% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.02
25 2007 1815 149.2 +0.54 +3.30 1.098 51.4% +4 -52 -56 53.1% +0.26 9–10 (47%) 13–9 (59%) 100.2 +0.31 2007 1486 99.1 -3.22 -0.28 0.831 45.7% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2008 1751 142.7 -1.76 +1.34 0.960 49.4% +12 +26 -24 48.5% -0.11 6–8 (43%) 10–10 (50%) 95.3 +1.39 2008 1507 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1680 134.6 -1.97 +1.08 0.969 49.3% +9 — — 48.1% -0.20 1–7 (13%) 8–3 (73%) 98.5 +0.07 2009 1730 130.5 -0.39 +0.74 0.974 49.4% -21 -13 — 51.2% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 -0.34
28 2010 1880 148.3 +0.94 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +5 -146 -149 51.4% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 9–8 (53%) 101.8 -0.24 2010 1653 134.9 -3.52 +0.17 0.895 48.1% +52 -19 -182 41.7% -0.46 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 92.0 +0.09
29 2011 1832 150.6 -0.65 -0.67 0.921 48.7% +2 -26 -186 46.0% -0.27 11–9 (55%) 8–12 (40%) 98.6 -2.73 2011 1819 141.7 -1.34 -0.12 0.947 49.2% -93 -18 -86 49.0% -0.07 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) 109.1 +0.47
30 2012 1752 149.6 -1.35 +0.73 0.950 49.5% +56 +12 -102 44.2% -0.23 7–5 (58%) 11–11 (50%) 100.4 -0.02 2012 1716 137.7 -1.80 +0.15 0.952 49.5% -31 +48 -3 45.8% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 8–10 (44%) 99.9 +0.63
31 2013 1795 155.2 -1.06 +2.01 1.008 50.4% +6 +18 -185 51.0% +0.23 14–10 (58%) 14–12 (54%) 101.6 -0.63 2013 1667 126.1 -3.42 -0.55 0.908 48.2% -63 +74 +118 41.1% -0.52 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 96.6 +1.16
32 2014 1765 141.8 -1.21 +0.74 0.990 49.9% -22 -29 -99 47.4% -0.17 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 98.5 -0.46 2014 1670 124.3 -1.32 -2.59 0.827 47.1% -101 +15 +100 40.8% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) 95.1 -0.27
33 2015 1692 136.3 -2.79 -0.68 0.873 47.9% +14 -6 +35 39.1% -0.68 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 93.9 +0.18 2015 1698 119.7 -2.83 +2.52 0.866 48.0% -40 — — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1654 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 151.5 -0.65 +1.56 1.005 50.2% 0 +14 -108 51.2% +0.11 126–118 (52%) 157–133 (54%) 102.3 -0.51 — 1871 133.5 -2.13 -0.20 0.909 48.4% -30 +7 +8 43.9% -0.40 26–45 (37%) 39–39 (50%) 98.9 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.